MHB Show ⌊a¹⁷⁸⁸⌋ and ⌊a¹⁹⁸⁸⌋ are both divisible by 17

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that both ⌊a¹⁷⁸⁸⌋ and ⌊a¹⁹⁸⁸⌋ are divisible by 17, where a is the greatest positive root of the polynomial x³ - 3x² + 1. By applying Newton's identities, the sequence P_n is established, revealing a periodicity of 16 when calculated modulo 17. It is shown that P_n = 1 mod 17 for n of the form 8k + 4, which includes both 1788 and 1988. As a result, since the contributions from the other roots diminish for large n, it follows that ⌊a^n⌋ is congruent to 0 mod 17. The proof confirms the divisibility of both floor expressions by 17.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Show ⌊a¹⁷⁸⁸⌋ and ⌊a¹⁹⁸⁸⌋ are both divisible by 17

Let $a$ be the greatest positive root of the equation $x^3− 3x^2+ 1 = 0$.

Show that $\left\lfloor{a^{1788}}\right\rfloor$ and $\left\lfloor{a^{1988}}\right\rfloor$ are both divisible by 17.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Show ⌊a¹⁷⁸⁸⌋ and ⌊a¹⁹⁸⁸⌋ are both divisible by 17

anemone said:
Let $a$ be the greatest positive root of the equation $x^3− 3x^2+ 1 = 0$.

Show that $\left\lfloor{a^{1788}}\right\rfloor$ and $\left\lfloor{a^{1988}}\right\rfloor$ are both divisible by 17.
[sp]Let $f(x) = x^3− 3x^2+ 1$. Then $f(-1) = -3$, $f(0) = 1$, $f(1) = -1$, $f(2) = -3$ and $f(3) = 1$. By the intermediate value theorem, the largest root, $a$, lies between $2$ and $3$; and the other two roots, $b$ and $c$, lie between $-1$ and $1$.

Let $P_n = a^n + b^n + c^n$. By Newton's identities, $$P_0 = P_1 = 3,\quad P_2 = 9, \quad P_3 = 24, \quad P_n = 3P_{n-1} - P_{n-3}\ \ (n>3).$$ Working mod $17$, it is easy to use that recurrence relation to calculate $P_n \pmod{17}$: $$ \begin{array}{r|ccccccccccccccccccc}n& 0&1&2&3&4 & 5&6&7&8&9 & 10&11&12&13&14 & 15&16&17&18 \\ \hline P_n\pmod{17}& 3&3&9&7&1 & 11&9&9&16&5 & 6&2&1&14&6 & 0&3&3&9 \end{array}.$$ Notice that the sequence starts to repeat when $n=16$, and therefore has period $16$. Also, $P_4 = P_{12} = 1 \pmod{17}$. It follows that $P_n = 1 \pmod{17}$ whenever $n$ is of the form $8k+4$.

But $P_n = a^n + b^n + c^n$. When $n$ is large and even, $b^n$ and $c^n$ will both be small and positive. In particular, $0<b^n+c^n<1$. So if $P_n=1\pmod{17}$ then $\left\lfloor a^n \right\rfloor = 0\pmod{17}$. Since $1788$ and $1988$ are both of the form $8k+4$, the result is proved.

[/sp]
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top