Show converges uniformly on compact subsets of C

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact Subsets
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the uniform convergence of the infinite product ∏ (1 - z/n^α) on compact subsets of the complex plane ℂ, specifically under the condition that α > 1.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conditions for uniform convergence, questioning the implications of compactness on the convergence behavior. There is a discussion about the dependency of n0 on z and the significance of the least upper bound on |z| within compact sets.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the role of compactness in establishing the necessary conditions for uniform convergence. The conversation is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored, particularly concerning the dependence of certain parameters on the compact set.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of compactness in the proof, particularly in relation to bounding the terms of the product and ensuring the existence of a finite n0 that works for all z in the compact set.

Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



If α > 1, show: [itex]∏ (1 - \frac{z}{n^α})[/itex] converges uniformly on compact subsets of ℂ.

Homework Equations



We say that ∏ fn converges uniformly on A if

1. ∃n0 such that fn(z) ≠ 0, ∀n ≥ n0, ∀z ∈ A.

2. {∏ fn} n=n0 to n0+0, converges uniformly on A to a non-vanishing function g such that ∃δ > 0 with |g| ≥ δ.

Theorem: ∏ fn on A converges uniformly ⇔ ∀ε > 0, ∃n0 such that

[itex]|∏ f_j(n) - 1| < ε[/itex], ∀n ≥ m ≥ n0, and z ∈ A. converges uniformly on compact subsets of ℂ.

The Attempt at a Solution



Of course, the limit of z/nα is 0, and there exists an n0 such that for all larger n fn ≠ 0, i.e. when |z/nα| < 1.

Moreover, as n → ∞, each nth term in the term approaches 1, so the infinite product definitely converges, and I'd say that it satisfies the theorem given.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If A is compact, does it have a least upper bound on |z|? That might be important to mention in your proof.
 
Shackleford said:
Of course, the limit of z/nα is 0, and there exists an n0 such that for all larger n fn ≠ 0, i.e. when |z/nα| < 1.
This is correct with one caveat: The n0 you mention is dependent of z. Here you need the compactness: Since [itex]C\subset \bigcup_{N} \left\{n>N\Rightarrow \frac{z}{n^{\alpha}}<\epsilon\right\}[/itex], the compactness says that a finite number of these is sufficient. Take the maximum of these N, and you are done.
 
Oh, yes. If it's compact, then it's close and bounded. Thanks for the refinement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K