Convergence of {fn} wrt to C(X) metric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of a sequence of functions {fn} in the context of the metric space C(X), which consists of continuous complex-valued bounded functions. It establishes that uniform convergence of {fn} to a function f is equivalent to convergence with respect to the supremum norm defined by ||f|| = sup_{x∈X}|f(x)|. The participants confirm that if {fn} converges to f under this metric, it guarantees uniform convergence, and vice versa, thereby validating the theorem regarding these convergence types.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces, specifically C(X) for continuous functions.
  • Knowledge of uniform convergence and its implications in functional analysis.
  • Familiarity with supremum norms and their definitions.
  • Basic principles of proof techniques in mathematical analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of metric spaces, focusing on C(X) and its applications.
  • Explore the concept of uniform convergence in greater depth, including examples and counterexamples.
  • Learn about supremum norms and their role in functional analysis.
  • Investigate theorems related to convergence in functional spaces, such as the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in functional analysis, students studying advanced calculus, and anyone interested in the properties of convergence in metric spaces.

camillio
Messages
74
Reaction score
2
Let C(X) be the set of continuous complex-valued bounded functions with domain X. Let {fn} be a sequence of functions on C. We say, that fn converges to f wrt to the metric of C(X) iff fn converges to f uniformly.

By definition of the uniform convergence, for any ε>0 there exists integer N s.t. n ≥ N implies |fn(x) - f(x)| ≤ ε for every x in X. Hence by the definition of supremum norm, the inequality is equivalent to sup(fn(x) - f(x)) ≤ ε.

I conclude, that:
1) the uniform convergence imposes that for every ε>0, there exists N from which on the functions fn and f are within this ε on whole X. Hence it always implies convergence wrt the metric of C(X), since exactly this ε can be used as the supremum of the distance fn and f.
2) What about the converse? I think, that if {fn} converges to f wrt to the metric of C(X), then the existence of such ε>0, being the supremum of the distance on whole X, implies the uniform convergence, as this ε can be used in its definition and the existence of N is guaranteed.

Am I right or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the question if it's true that ##f_n\to f## uniformly if and only if ##f_n\to f## with respect to the metric defined from the norm defined by ##\|f\|=\sup_{x\in X}|f(x)|## for all f in C(X)? If that's what you're asking, the answer is yes. This is how I would start a proof of that theorem:

Let ##\varepsilon>0## be arbitrary.

Suppose that ##f_n\to f## with respect to the norm (metric). Choose N such that for all n≥N,
$$\|f_n-f\|<\varepsilon.$$ This choice ensures that for all n≥N and all x in X,
$$|f_n(x)-f(x)| \dots $$
So ##f_n\to f## uniformly.

Can you fill in the details (at the dots)? The proof of the converse is very similar.
 
Thank you, Frederic. This was exactly what I was thinking about, and, roughly said, your answer follows the idea provided by me in (2). The goal was to ensure that I'm not missing something.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K