Show: Elementary row operations don't affect solution sets

Click For Summary
Elementary row operations (EROs) do not affect the solution sets of linear systems, and this can be proven by demonstrating that interchanging equations, multiplying an equation by a non-zero constant, or adding a multiple of one equation to another does not change the solutions. To establish this, one must show that each operation maintains the equivalence of the equations involved. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the matrix representation and the linear system rather than overcomplicating the proof with matrix manipulations. Ultimately, proving these properties for all linear systems solidifies the understanding that EROs preserve solution sets. This foundational concept is crucial in linear algebra.
WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Show that elementary row operations don't affect solutions sets in linear systems

Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution


It's pretty easy to come up with a random linear system and perform ERO on them and showing that solutions are not affected, but is there all there is to it? Do I need to show that this works throughout all possible forms of linear systems or will this be known as "proving"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, to prove this you need to show it for all linear systems of equations.

Do you have any experience of formal proofs?
 
PeroK said:
Yes, to prove this you need to show it for all linear systems of equations.

Do you have any experience of formal proofs?

I have very little experience of proving statements, especially in LA (I just got through 2 lectures). Could you provide me with a guideline? Thanks!
 
The key here is that having the same solutions to two sets of equations can be stated as:

##x## is a solution to one system iff it is a solution to the other system.

Does that make sense to you?
 
Not really, sorry. Unless you mean that x is a solution to the system if it is a solution to all equations in that system?
 
WWCY said:
Not really, sorry. Unless you mean that x is a solution to the system if it is a solution to all equations in that system?

Yes, ##x = (x_1, x_2, \dots ,x_n)## is a solution to the system if it is a solution to all equations in the system
 
How could I use this to prove the statement? Do I use a general augmented matrix from a1n to amn to do this?
 
WWCY said:
How could I use this to prove the statement? Do I use a general augmented matrix from a1n to amn to do this?

Putting things in a matrix only complicates matters. Think of the simplest row operation: exchanging two rows. How could you prove that doesn't change the solutions?

Hint: try to think about it as simply as possible!
 
WWCY said:

Homework Statement


Show that elementary row operations don't affect solutions sets in linear systems

Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution


It's pretty easy to come up with a random linear system and perform ERO on them and showing that solutions are not affected, but is there all there is to it? Do I need to show that this works throughout all possible forms of linear systems or will this be known as "proving"?

Try to think about the relation between the matrix and the system.

What happens when I exchange 2 rows in the matrix? What system does the new matrix correspond to? Do the original system and the new system have the same solution?
 
  • #10
Math_QED said:
Try to think about the relation between the matrix and the system.

What happens when I exchange 2 rows in the matrix? What system does the new matrix correspond to? Do the original system and the new system have the same solution?
I agree with @PeroK here -- that bringing in matrices adds unnecessary complication. The original problem statement mentions linear systems (of equations), with no mention of matrices. The questions to consider are these:
  • Does interchanging two equations change the solution?
  • Does replacing an equation by a multiple of itself change the solution?
  • Does replacing one equation by adding a multiple of another equation to the first equation change the solution?
 
  • #11
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but are you guys saying that it can be solved as such:

1. Prove that interchanging 2 equations don't affect the solution set,
2. Show that constant multiples of an equation don't affect its solution,
3. Show how adding a constant-multiple of eqn 1 to eqn 2 doesn't affect a solution set because we're actually adding the same values to both sides of eqn 2,
4. Generalise this result across all systems of linear equations?
 
  • #12
Yes, but I've tidied this up a bit:

For any system of linear equations:

1. Show that interchanging any two equations doesn't affect the solution set,
2. Show that multiplying any equation by a non-zero constant doesn't t affect the solution set.
3. Show that adding a constant-multiple of any equation to any other equation doesn't affect the solution set.
 
  • Like
Likes WWCY
  • #13
Alright, thanks a lot guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K