Show f(x) >= g(x) given integral of f is >= g on any subinterval of [a,b]

  • Thread starter Thread starter afkguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that if the integral of a continuous function f is greater than or equal to that of another continuous function g over any subinterval of [a,b], then f(x) must be greater than or equal to g(x) for all x in [a,b]. The proof employs a contradiction approach, assuming there exists a point c in [a,b] where g(c) exceeds f(c). By leveraging the continuity of f and g, the discussion concludes that this assumption leads to a contradiction when considering the integrals over the neighborhood of c.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions on closed intervals
  • Familiarity with the properties of integrals
  • Knowledge of the fundamental theorem of calculus
  • Experience with proof by contradiction techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the fundamental theorem of calculus in detail
  • Explore the properties of continuous functions and their implications for integrals
  • Learn about proof techniques, specifically proof by contradiction
  • Investigate the mean value theorem for integrals and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced calculus concepts, particularly those studying properties of integrals and continuity in real analysis.

afkguy
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



f,g are cont. fcns on [a,b] and \int f \geq \int g for any subinterval [i,j] of [a,b]. Show f(x) \geq g(x) on [a,b].

Homework Equations



Don't know if I should have used something like the fundamental theorem or mean value of integrals or something. I was using theorems like those for other problems in this section but wasn't sure about this one so I took a different direction.

The Attempt at a Solution



Assume that this isn't true, i.e., there exists some c in [a,b] s.t. g(c) > f(c).

f and g are continuous so let's choose our \epsilon = g(c) - f(c), so there should exist some \delta > 0 where:

|f(x) - f(c)| < \epsilon whenever |x - c| < \delta

Thus 2f(c) - g(c) < f(x) < g(c) when x is in (c - \delta, c + \delta)

So f(x) < g(c) whenever x is in (c - \delta, c + \delta).

So consider any partition p of any subinterval [i,j] of [a,b] where the one of the subintervals of [i,j] is (c - \delta, c + \delta).

I stopped here because I'm pretty sure I chose the wrong epsilon and I wasn't really sure if I was even in the right direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well i am not sure how you would go about 'proving' this but knowing that the area of f is always greater than or equal to g on any sub interval [i,j] in the interval [a,b] implies that f never intersects g, they may touch and be equal but f will never be less than g because the area would be less on the sub interval [i,j] where f<g. The fact that this is true with any sub interval (implying infinitesimal intervals as well) means that f>=g.
 
Proof by contradiction is a good strategy here and you had good ideas, but you are muddling yourself up by dealing with details that we don't need, such as finding epsilons.

1) Assume g(c) > f(c) for some c in [a,b]
2) Use the continuity property to deduce there is some neighborhood (c - e, c + e) ( e>0 ) where g > f in that neighborhood.
3) Consider the integral over this interval to find a contradiction.
 
To prove 2) stated above use the function g(x)-f(x) which is also continuous and you know it has a positive limit at x=c.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K