Show that ... arctan(1/v) = (pi/2) - arctan(v)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calixto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the identity arctan(1/v) = (pi/2) - arctan(v). Participants highlight two methods: using a right triangle for a geometric interpretation and employing the logarithmic representation of the arctangent function. Mhill emphasizes the importance of understanding branch cuts when using complex variables for this proof. The consensus is that while both methods are valid, the geometric approach is simpler and more intuitive.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric functions, specifically arctangent.
  • Familiarity with right triangle properties and their relation to trigonometric identities.
  • Basic knowledge of complex variables and logarithmic functions.
  • Awareness of branch cuts in complex analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric interpretation of trigonometric identities using right triangles.
  • Learn about the logarithmic representation of arctangent functions.
  • Research the concept of branch cuts in complex analysis.
  • Explore additional proofs of trigonometric identities using complex variables.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying trigonometry and complex analysis, and anyone interested in understanding trigonometric identities and their proofs.

Calixto
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Kudos to whoever can explain this!

The original question was... how can I show that ... arctan(1/v) = (pi/2) - arctan(v) ?

I understand how to do this the easy way... by forming a right triangle and so on and so forth...

But could someone please explain to me what this is about? Mhill posted this and said it would work, but I don't understand...if you use the log representation for artan (1/x) and artan (x) so { artan(x)= (2i)^{-1}(log(1+ix)-log(1-ix)) }

and the same replacing x--> 1/x you

get the accurate result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you understand the trig way to do this, then you don't need to do it using complex variables. If you do want to do it that way you'll want to be careful about where the branch cuts are for your definition of log. If you don't know what a branch cut is then don't do it. It's needlessly complicated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K