Show that F transforms as an isovector.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the variation of the field strength tensor, denoted as \(\delta F^{\mu\nu}\), transforms as an isovector under gauge transformations. The key equations referenced include \(F^{\mu\nu} = \partial^{\mu}W^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu}W^{\mu} - gW^{\mu} \times W^{\nu}\) and \(\delta W^{\mu} = \partial^{\mu}\epsilon(x) + g\epsilon(x) \times W^{\mu}(x)\) from "An Informal Introduction to Gauge Field Theories" by I. J. R. Aitchison. The solution reveals that the terms involving cross products do not cancel as initially assumed, leading to the correct transformation \(\delta F^{\mu\nu} = g\epsilon(x) \times F^{\mu\nu}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gauge theories and field strength tensors
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and cross products
  • Knowledge of the concepts of gauge transformations
  • Proficiency in tensor notation and manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gauge transformations in detail
  • Explore the implications of the field strength tensor in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the use of vector identities in simplifying tensor equations
  • Learn about the physical significance of isovectors in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and anyone studying gauge theories and their applications in particle physics.

Jimmy Snyder
Messages
1,137
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Show that
[tex]\delta F^{\mu\nu} = g\epsilon(x) \times F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex]F^{\mu\nu} = \partial^{\mu}W^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu}W^{\mu} - gW^{\mu} \times W^{\nu}[/tex]
[tex]\delta W^{\mu} = \partial^{\mu}\epsilon(x) + g\epsilon(x) \times W^{\mu}(x)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


The equation in part 1 is eqn (3.46) on page 33 of An Informal Introduction to Gauge Field Theories by I. J. R. Aitchison (digitally printed version 2007). The first equation in part 2 is eqn (3.45) on the same page, and the second equation in part 2 is eqn (3.36) on page 32 of the same book. Here is what I get.

[tex]\delta F^{\mu\nu} = \delta\partial^{\mu}W^{\nu} - \delta\partial^{\nu}W^{\mu} - \delta(gW^{\mu} \times W^{\nu})[/tex]
[tex]= \partial^{\mu} \delta W^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu}\delta W^{\mu} - g\delta W^{\mu} \times W^{\nu} - gW^{\mu} \times \delta W^{\nu}[/tex]
[tex]= \partial^{\mu}\partial^{\nu}\epsilon + g\partial^{\mu}\epsilon \times W^{\nu} + g\epsilon \times \partial^{\mu}W^{\nu}[/tex]
[tex]+ \partial^{\nu}\partial^{\mu}\epsilon - g\partial^{\nu}\epsilon \times W^{\mu} + g\epsilon \times \partial^{\nu}W^{\mu}[/tex]
[tex]- g\partial^{\mu}\epsilon \times W^{\nu} - g^2\epsilon \times W^{\mu} \times W^{\nu}[/tex]
[tex]- g W^{\mu} \times \partial^{\nu}\epsilon - g^2 W^{\mu} \times \epsilon \times W^{\nu}[/tex]
Lots cancels out here. Unfortunately, too much does. I get

[tex]\delta F^{\mu\nu} = g\epsilon(x) \times (\partial^{\mu}W^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu}W^{\mu})[/tex]

Where is my mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to be careful with the terms that involve two cross products. Use of parentheses will help. You have two terms: -g2([itex]\epsilon[/itex]xWμ)xW[itex]\nu[/itex] -g2Wμx([itex]\epsilon[/itex]xW[itex]\nu[/itex])

These two terms do not cancel. You can show that the two terms together reduce to -g2[itex]\epsilon[/itex]x(WμxW[itex]\nu[/itex])

See identity #3 in this list http://wwwppd.nrl.navy.mil/nrlformulary/vector_identities.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's it TSny. Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K