Show that if a < b + ε for every ε>0 then a ≤ b

  • Thread starter Thread starter kmikias
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the statement that if \( a < b + \epsilon \) for every \( \epsilon > 0 \), then \( a \leq b \). The subject area is mathematical reasoning, specifically within the context of inequalities and proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various proof strategies, including direct proof and proof by contradiction. There is an attempt to clarify the correct formulation of the proof and the assumptions needed for contradiction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's attempts. Some guidance has been offered regarding the structure of a proof by contradiction, and multiple approaches are being explored without a clear consensus on the correct method yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, particularly the requirement to formulate the proof correctly and the implications of the assumptions made about \( a \) and \( b \).

kmikias
Messages
72
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that if a < b + ε for every ε>0 then a ≤ b

Homework Equations



I am not sure if this is a right way to do it? I just want to know if it does make sense

The Attempt at a Solution


proof.
a < b + ε → if a is bounded above by b+ε then b is the least upper bound for a.
which means a ≤ b.
ε is the upper bound of a since b≤ε.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No, that doesn't work. Try formulating it as a proof by contradiction.
 


Dick said:
No, that doesn't work. Try formulating it as a proof by contradiction.

ok! so i tried it this way...

Suppose a > b+ε for every ε>0,then a≤b
let ε= 1/2a-1/2b since a-b>ε→→→a-b >1/2a-1/2b (true)

so a> b+ 1/2a-1/2b
1/2a>1/2b
a>b which contradict from the first agreement ∅
 


kmikias said:
ok! so i tried it this way...

Suppose a > b+ε for every ε>0,then a≤b

Unfortunately, no. To do a proof by contradiction, you need to assume the hypothesis and the negation of the conclusion.
 


gb7nash said:
Unfortunately, no. To do a proof by contradiction, you need to assume the hypothesis and the negation of the conclusion.

ok..another try...i won't stop until i get this ...

suppose a>b and let ε = 1/2 (a-b) ...(i think you know where i get that)

so a < b+ε → a< b+(1/2a-1/2b)
then a-1/2 < b-1/2 → 1/2a<1/2b→ a<b CONTRADICTION ∅
 


I think that's is the answer...what do you think
 


kmikias said:
ok..another try...i won't stop until i get this ...

suppose a>b and let ε = 1/2 (a-b) ...(i think you know where i get that)

so a < b+ε → a< b+(1/2a-1/2b)
then a-(1/2)a < b-(1/2)b → 1/2a<1/2b→ a<b CONTRADICTION ∅

It looks fine, just fixed a minor typo on your part.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kmas55

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K