Show that linear transformation is surjective but not injective

Click For Summary
The linear transformation T: M2x2(F) -> P2(F) defined by T(a b c d) = (a-d) + (b-d)x + (c-d)x² is shown to be surjective but not injective. To prove surjectivity, one can demonstrate that specific matrices map to the polynomials 1, x, and x². The transformation is not injective since a non-zero matrix can map to the zero polynomial. The dimensions of the spaces involved—3 for 2x2 matrices and 2 for second-order polynomials—support this conclusion. Thus, the mapping's surjectivity inherently indicates its lack of injectivity.
pearl0993
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

My question is to show that the linear transformation T: M2x2(F) -> P2(F) defined by

T (a b c d) = (a-d) | (b-d)x | (c-d)x2

is surjective but not injective.

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pearl0993 said:
Hi,

My question is to show that the linear transformation T: M2x2(F) -> P2(F) defined by

T (a b c d) = (a-d) | (b-d)x | (c-d)x2

is surjective but not injective.

thanks in advance.

Hey pearl0993 and welcome to the forums.

What is the space of your answer (i.e. P2(F))? Is it a 2x2 column vector?

Also it would be helpful to show any working out or any ideas that you have for answering the questions.

Also if you are completely lost with these ideas, this web-page might help you get started:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bijection,_injection_and_surjection
 
i think what the intended mapping was (this is just an educated guess) is:

[a b]
[c d], maps to:

(a-d) + (b-d)x + (c-d)x2.

to prove surjectivity, it suffices to exhibit 3 matrices:

one whose image is 1, another whose image is x, and a 3rd whose image is x2.

to prove it is not injective, it suffices to exhibit a non-zero matrix that maps to the 0-polynomial.
 
another way to handle the problem is by noting that the space of 2x2 matrices is of dimension three and the space of up to second order polynomials is of dimension 2.

Then proving surjectivity in the way described by Devenoe automatically shows the map is not injective.

Since a linear bijection is an isomorphism of vector spaces and vector spaces that are isomorphic have to at least have equal dimension.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K