Show that Matrix Multiplication is Associative

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the associative property of matrix multiplication, specifically showing that (AB)C = A(BC). The user attempts to derive the (i,j)-entry of the product (AB)C using the definitions of matrix multiplication but encounters confusion regarding the summation process. A key insight provided is that the (i,j)-entry of (AB)C requires a double summation, reflecting the nested nature of matrix multiplication. The solution emphasizes the importance of carefully applying the definition of matrix multiplication to resolve the user's confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix multiplication definitions
  • Familiarity with summation notation
  • Knowledge of matrix entries and indexing
  • Basic linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix multiplication, including associativity and distributivity
  • Practice deriving matrix multiplication results using summation notation
  • Explore examples of matrix multiplication with different dimensions
  • Learn about applications of matrix multiplication in linear transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, educators teaching matrix operations, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of matrix properties and their applications.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Show that (AB)C=A(BC)

I am just trying to do this to try to gain some experience with problems like this. I saw in my text that they did a similar example for distributivity using the definition of matrix multiplication, so I thought I could use that approach.

The Attempt at a Solution



Let the (i,j)-entry of A be given by aij
Let the (i,j)-entry of B be given by bij
Let the (i,j)-entry of C be given by cij

Then the (i,j)-entry of (AB) is given by

\sum_{k=1}^na_{ik}b_{kj}

Here is where I get lost. I was thinking of then writing that the (i,j)-entry of (AB)C would be given by

\sum_{k=1}^n(a_{ik}b_{kj})c_{kj}but I don't think that this works...and I am not sure why or why not:redface:

Any hints?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the right idea, but your element of (AB)C is incorrect. Each entry in AB is going to be a summation, and then each entry in (AB)C should be a summation in which each term contains a summation (specifically, the piece from AB is going to be a summation). So your final equation for the (i,j)th entry of (AB)C should contain a double summation.

Just walk through the definition of matrix multiplication real carefully and you should be able to get it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K