Show that {u+v,v-w,w-u} is a basis of R^3 if {u,v,w} is

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hydroxide
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that if {u,v,w} is a basis for R3, then the set {u+v, v-w, w-u} is also a basis for R3. The proof relies on demonstrating that the new set of vectors is linearly independent and spans R3. The participants highlight that linear independence can be shown through inspection and by solving simultaneous equations. The discussion also touches on the concept of linear dependence in a different context, specifically when considering a set of vectors in R4.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and bases in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of linear independence and dependence
  • Familiarity with the concept of spanning sets
  • Ability to solve simultaneous equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear independence in vector spaces
  • Learn how to express vectors as linear combinations of other vectors
  • Explore the implications of bases in higher-dimensional spaces, such as R4
  • Investigate the role of characteristic fields in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians interested in vector space theory, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of basis and linear independence concepts.

Hydroxide
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose {u,v,w} is a basis for (R3). Show that {u+v,v-w,w-u} is also a basis for (R3).

The Attempt at a Solution



By definition, u,v and w are linearly independent and they span (R3).
I really don't know where to go from here though.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you prove that u+v , v-w , w-v is also linearly independent? If so, do you know why that's enough to make it a base?
 
I think there is an error in what is written. That set of three vectors is obvisouly linearly dependent: w-v = -(v-w).
 
matt grime said:
I think there is an error in what is written. That set of three vectors is obvisouly linearly dependent: w-v = -(v-w).

My bad, its fixed now
 
Was post 2 sufficient to help you? There is an easier way, in this case. It is perfectly possible to do it by inspection. Just adding some of those vectors together yields that u,v,w are all in the span of the three new ones, hence they form a basis (assuming char=/=2).
 
daniel_i_l said:
Can you prove that u+v , v-w , w-v is also linearly independent? If so, do you know why that's enough to make it a base?
How would I show that they are Linearly independent.

matt grime said:
Was post 2 sufficient to help you? There is an easier way, in this case. It is perfectly possible to do it by inspection. Just adding some of those vectors together yields that u,v,w are all in the span of the three new ones, hence they form a basis (assuming char=/=2).
But part (ii) is :
Suppose {u,v,w,x} is a basis for R4. Show that {u+v,v+w,w+x,x+u} is NOT a basis for R4 So I can't really do it by inspection.

Thanks guys
 
Yes, you can. Because it is easy to see by inspection that those 4 elements are linearly dependent. It is also good to spot easy things. And it will work in general, since that new set of vectors is a basis if and only if you can expess u,v,w as combinations of the three new ones, and it is easy to see how to do that by eye. In general, you need to set up and solve some simultaneous equations. In this case you can see the solution without doing and linear algebra.

As for your other question: you know how to solve simultaneous equations, so do it. Find the a,b,c such that a(u+v)+b(v-w)+c(w-u)=0, and show that the only solution is for a=b=c=0. Note you have to rearrange to write things in terms of u,v,w which are known to be a basis. More succintly, note this implies (a-c)u+(a+b)v+(c-b)w=0, so since, u,v,w are a basis, this implies a-c=a+b=c-b=0, whence a=b=c=0.
 
Last edited:
How do you show things are linearly independent in general? Remember that lin. independence comes from

c_1 \mathbf{v_1} + c_2 \mathbf{v_2} + ... + c_n \mathbf{v_n} = 0

Is there a way to pick the constants in the linear combinations such that you get one of the other vectors?
 
thanks everyone and especially matt grime for your patience
I've done it now.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K