Show that V has a basis of eigenvectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter evilpostingmong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Eigenvectors
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
evilpostingmong
Messages
338
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let T: V---->V be a linear operator where dim V=n. Show that V
has a basis of eigenvectors if and only if V has a basis B such that
TB is diagonal.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Let T=[a1,1...an,1] ai,j=/=0
[a1,n...an,n]
Let TB=[a1,1v1...0n,1]
[01,n...an,nvn]
Since this is diagonal, and ai,j=/=0,
then we have a basis of eigenvectors (these are meant to be vertical)<[v1,...0]...[0...vn]>
that, after being mulitplied by T, formed the matrix TB.
To show that they are eigenvectors, a possible linear combination is
[v1,...0] and when multiplied by T gives a1,1[v1,...0]+...+a1,n[v1,...0]
=(a1,1+...+a1,n)[v1,...0]. Since [v1,...0] is an eigenvector, and
the others follow the same logic, mulitplying the basis of eigenvectors by T
should produce a diagonal matrix, as shown.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
evilpostingmong said:

Homework Statement


Let T: V---->V be a linear operator where dim V=n. Show that V
has a basis of eigenvectors if and only if V has a basis B such that
TB is diagonal.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Let T=[a1,1...an,1] ai,j=/=0
[a1,n...an,n]
Let TB=[a1,1v1...0n,1]
[01,n...an,nvn]
Since this is diagonal, and ai,j=/=0,
then we have a basis of eigenvectors (these are meant to be vertical)<[v1,...0]...[0...vn]>
that, after being mulitplied by T, formed the matrix TB.
To show that they are eigenvectors, a possible linear combination is
[v1,...0] and when multiplied by T gives a1,1[v1,...0]+...+a1,n[v1,...0]
=(a1,1+...+a1,n)[v1,...0]. Since [v1,...0] is an eigenvector, and
the others follow the same logic, mulitplying the basis of eigenvectors by T
should produce a diagonal matrix, as shown.

Suppose V has a basis [tex]B=\{b_1,\ldots,b_n\}[/tex] consisting of eigenvectors of T. Then for each j, [tex]T b_j = \lambda_j b_j[/tex]. If I express this equation in terms of the basis B, then
[tex][T]_B [b_j]_B = \lambda_j [b_j]_B[/tex]
But [tex][b_j]_B[/tex] is simply a column vector containing all zeros except for a 1 in the j'th position. Carrying out the matrix multiplication then shows that
[tex][T]_B = \Lambda[/tex]
where [tex]\Lambda[/tex] is the diagonal matrix whose diagonal entries are [tex]\{\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_n\}[/tex]. This gives you one direction of the proof. For the other direction, you can essentially reverse the steps above to verify that the [tex]\lambda_j[/tex]'s must be eigenvalues and the [tex]b_j[/tex]'s must be eigenvectors.
 
Yeah, I did the other direction by assuming that TB is diagonal then showing that
the basis consists of eigenvectors and that TB consists of eigenvalues, though I
think I messed up when I mentioned a1,1+...+a1,n is an eigenvalue since I multiplied wrong.
It should be a1,1 for the eigenvalue of [v1...0]. Made a mistake with multiplication.
Oh and when I said "then we have a basis of eigenvectors" I shouldn't've called
the basis of eigenvectors a basis of eigenvectors, since I was proving it in the first place,
and I should've called the scalar an eigenvalue. It's these small mistakes that make a big
difference.
 
Last edited: