Show that v, ø(v), ø(v)^2 are independent

  • Thread starter Thread starter victoranderson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Independent
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the linear independence of the vectors v, ø(v), and ø(v)^2. Participants are exploring the implications of linear dependence and the definitions associated with it.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand how to demonstrate the linear independence of the vectors by assuming they are dependent and seeking contradictions. Questions about the definitions of linear dependence and how to apply them are raised.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the proof structure, with some participants providing partial solutions and others questioning the validity of those solutions. Hints and guidance are being shared to help clarify the reasoning process.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of linear dependence, leading to discussions about the assumptions made in the problem. There are also mentions of specific notation that may cause confusion.

victoranderson
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Please see attached question.
I can finish part (a)

For part b, how can I find ø(v) ?
Although I can find ø(v1) and ø(v2) but I think it is unrelated to ø(v)...
 

Attachments

  • partb.jpg
    partb.jpg
    41.1 KB · Views: 491
Physics news on Phys.org
victoranderson said:
Please see attached question.
I can finish part (a)

For part b, how can I find ø(v) ?
Although I can find ø(v1) and ø(v2) but I think it is unrelated to ø(v)...

Part b isn't really related to the first part. If you assume ##v, \phi(v), \phi^2(v)## are linearly DEPENDENT what does that tell you about them? What's the definition of linear dependence? Try to use that to reach a contradiction to what you know about the vectors. If you can show one of them must be zero then you've shown they are linearly independent.
 
Dick said:
Part b isn't really related to the first part. If you assume ##v, \phi(v), \phi^2(v)## are linearly DEPENDENT what does that tell you about them? What's the definition of linear dependence? Try to use that to reach a contradiction to what you know about the vectors. If you can show one of them must be zero then you've shown they are linearly independent.

(b)
Thank you for your reply

This is my solution. I do not know if it is correct.
Assume v, ø(v) and ø(v)^2 are linearly dependent

[tex]=> a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi (v)^{2} = 0[/tex]
for [tex]a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}[/tex] not all zero

since [tex]\phi (v)^{2} \neq 0[/tex] we have [tex]a_{3}=0[/tex]

Contradiction, so v, ø(v) and ø(v)^2 are linearly dependent
 
Last edited:
I have another question about part c.
Why column 1 is M^2*v? How can we know?

Please see attached. Many thanks.
 

Attachments

  • partc.jpg
    partc.jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 453
victoranderson said:
(b)
Thank you for your reply

This is my solution. I do not know if it is correct.
Assume v, ø(v) and ø(v)^2 are linearly dependent

[tex]=> a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi (v)^{2} = 0[/tex]
for [tex]a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}[/tex] not all zero

since [tex]\phi (v)^{2} \neq 0[/tex] we have [tex]a_{3}=0[/tex]

Contradiction, so v, ø(v) and ø(v)^2 are linearly dependent

That's not correct at all. You did get the definition of linear dependence right. So you have ##a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi^2 (v) = 0## (notice I wrote ##\phi^2 (v)## not ##\phi (v)^2## that's what you really want). It's worth trying to take it slowly and get this right. It's pretty basic. ##\phi^2 (v) \ne 0## doesn't imply anything about ##a_3##. I'll give you a hint. What happens if you apply ##\phi^2## to that equation? What does that tell you about ##a_1##?
 
Last edited:
victoranderson said:
I have another question about part c.
Why column 1 is M^2*v? How can we know?

Please see attached. Many thanks.

It's much better to post new questions in new threads.
 
Dick said:
That's not correct at all. You did get the definition of linear dependence right. So you have ##a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi^2 (v) = 0## (notice I wrote ##\phi^2 (v)## not ##\phi (v)^2## that's what you really want). It's worth trying to take it slowly and get this right. It's pretty basic. ##\phi^2 (v) \ne 0## doesn't imply anything about ##a_3##. I'll give you a hint. What happens if you apply ##\phi^2## to that equation? What does that tell you about ##a_1##?

I am a beginner in this topic...I know the trick is to add phi to the equation
is this a correct proof?

Assume v, ø(v) and ø(v)^2 are linearly dependent

[tex]=> a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0[/tex]
for [tex]a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}[/tex] not all zero

[tex]=> \phi^2( a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v)) = 0[/tex]

since [tex]\phi^2 \neq 0[/tex]

it leads to contradiction
 
victoranderson said:
I am a beginner in this topic...I know the trick is to add phi to the equation
is this a correct proof?

Assume v, ø(v) and ø(v)^2 are linearly dependent

[tex]=> a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0[/tex]
for [tex]a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}[/tex] not all zero

[tex]=> \phi^2( a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v)) = 0[/tex]

since [tex]\phi^2 \neq 0[/tex]

it leads to contradiction

Nope, not correct. ##\phi^2( a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v)) = a_1 \phi^2(v) +a_2 \phi^3(v) + a_3 \phi^4(v)##, what can you say about ##\phi^3(v)## and ##\phi^4(v)##??
 
Dick said:
Nope, not correct. ##\phi^2( a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v)) = a_1 \phi^2(v) +a_2 \phi^3(v) + a_3 \phi^4(v)##, what can you say about ##\phi^3(v)## and ##\phi^4(v)##??

In my opinion, ##\phi^3(v)## = 0 => ##\phi^4(v)## = 0

so, ##a_1 \phi^2(v) +a_2 \phi^3(v) + a_3 \phi^4(v)##=0 implies ##a_1 \phi^2(v)## = 0

which gives ##a_1=0##

and it leads to contradiction??
 
  • #10
victoranderson said:
In my opinion, ##\phi^3(v)## = 0 => ##\phi^4(v)## = 0

so, ##a_1 \phi^2(v) +a_2 \phi^3(v) + a_3 \phi^4(v)##=0 implies ##a_1 \phi^2(v)## = 0

which gives ##a_1=0##

and it leads to contradiction??

It's not a contradiction yet. Now put ##a_1=0## into ##a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0##. Any ideas what to do next?
 
  • #11
Dick said:
It's not a contradiction yet. Now put ##a_1=0## into ##a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0##. Any ideas what to do next?

Thanks dick, i know the trick now.
So this is my complete proof of part (b), please have a look.

Assume v, ##\phi (v)## and ##\phi ^{2}(v)## are linearly dependent

i.e ##a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi^2 (v) = 0## for ##a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}## not all zero

## \phi^2( a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v)) = 0 ##

=> ## a_1 \phi^2(v) +a_2 \phi^3(v) + a_3 \phi^4(v) = 0##

Since ##\phi^3(v)## = 0 => ##\phi^4(v)## = 0, we have ##a_{1}=0##

So the equation ##a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0 ## gives ##a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0##

## \phi (a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v)) = 0 ##

=> ##a_{2}\phi ^2(v)+a_{3}\phi ^{3}(v) = 0##

and once again, since ##\phi^3(v)= 0## and ##\phi^2 \neq 0 ##

we have ##a_{2}=0 ##

so the equation ##a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0 ## gives ##a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0##

since ##\phi^2 \neq 0 ## we have ##a_{3}=0 ##

This leads to contradiction, since we assume ##a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}## not all zero

so v, ##\phi (v)## and ##\phi ^{2}(v)## are linearly INDEPENDENT
 
  • #12
victoranderson said:
Thanks dick, i know the trick now.
So this is my complete proof of part (b), please have a look.

Assume v, ##\phi (v)## and ##\phi ^{2}(v)## are linearly dependent

i.e ##a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi^2 (v) = 0## for ##a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}## not all zero

## \phi^2( a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v)) = 0 ##

=> ## a_1 \phi^2(v) +a_2 \phi^3(v) + a_3 \phi^4(v) = 0##

Since ##\phi^3(v)## = 0 => ##\phi^4(v)## = 0, we have ##a_{1}=0##

So the equation ##a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0 ## gives ##a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0##

## \phi (a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v)) = 0 ##

=> ##a_{2}\phi ^2(v)+a_{3}\phi ^{3}(v) = 0##

and once again, since ##\phi^3(v)= 0## and ##\phi^2 \neq 0 ##

we have ##a_{2}=0 ##

so the equation ##a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0 ## gives ##a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0##

since ##\phi^2 \neq 0 ## we have ##a_{3}=0 ##

This leads to contradiction, since we assume ##a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}## not all zero

so v, ##\phi (v)## and ##\phi ^{2}(v)## are linearly INDEPENDENT

That's perfect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #13
victoranderson said:
so the equation ##a_{1}v+a_{2}\phi (v)+a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0 ## gives ##a_{3}\phi ^{2}(v) = 0##

since ##\phi^2\color\red{(v)} \neq 0 ## we have ##a_{3}=0 ##

This leads to contradiction, since we assume ##a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}## not all zero

so v, ##\phi (v)## and ##\phi ^{2}(v)## are linearly INDEPENDENT

Dick said:
That's perfect.

Almost. Correction in red. It isn't ##\phi^2## that isn't zero, it's ##\phi^2(v)## that isn't.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K