Show the series (1/2)^sqrt(n) converges

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the series \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{\sqrt{n}}\). Participants are exploring various methods to demonstrate its convergence, including the use of convergence tests and comparisons with known convergent series.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants have attempted various convergence tests, including the ratio and root tests, but found them inconclusive. Some are considering the integral test and the comparison test, while others are questioning how to apply these methods effectively. There is also discussion about rewriting the series to facilitate comparison with geometric series.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into potential approaches, such as using the integral test and exploring comparisons based on perfect squares. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in applying these methods, and some participants express uncertainty about their reasoning and the validity of their approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints related to the application of various tests and the need for specific comparisons, indicating that they are working within the framework of homework guidelines that may limit certain methods.

Ryker
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Show \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty (\frac{1}{2})^{\sqrt{n}} converges.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've pretty much tried all convergence tests and failed miserably. Both the ratio and the root test are inconclusive, as the limits are 1. I can't really use the integral test, and I don't know what else to compare this to to show that the series indeed converges. I know it does, but I just can't show it.

One idea I had is to rewrite the sum as \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty (\frac{1}{2})^{\sqrt{n}} = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty (\frac{1}{2^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}}})^{n}, where the thing in brackets is less than 1 for all n. Knowing the geometric series converges for r < 1, this would imply this series also converges... Except that I don't think reasoning is any good, since for any such r < 1, the thing in brackets will eventually get bigger than r. This is all I've got now, though.

Ugh, any help here would be greatly appreciated, as always.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ryker said:

Homework Statement


Show \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty (\frac{1}{2})^{\sqrt{n}} converges.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've pretty much tried all convergence tests and failed miserably. Both the ratio and the root test are inconclusive, as the limits are 1. I can't really use the integral test, and I don't know what else to compare this to to show that the series indeed converges. I know it does, but I just can't show it.

One idea I had is to rewrite the sum as \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty (\frac{1}{2})^{\sqrt{n}} = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty (\frac{1}{2^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}}})^{n}, where the thing in brackets is less than 1 for all n. Knowing the geometric series converges for r < 1, this would imply this series also converges... Except that I don't think reasoning is any good, since for any such r < 1, the thing in brackets will eventually get bigger than r. This is all I've got now, though.

Ugh, any help here would be greatly appreciated, as always.
Try the integral test, or the comparison test.
 
Hmm, how would I use the integral test? Integrate (1/2)√x, and show that the sum from 2 to n is smaller than the integral from 1 to n?

As for the comparison test, like I mentioned, I did try it, I just couldn't find anything to compare the function to.
 
If I am not mistaken, it is a theorem that if the integral method works, then the sum converges in all cases, so you wouldn't need to prove the sum is smaller than the sum.
 
Ryker said:
Hmm, how would I use the integral test? Integrate (1/2)√x, and show that the sum from 2 to n is smaller than the integral from 1 to n?

As for the comparison test, like I mentioned, I did try it, I just couldn't find anything to compare the function to.
A possible comparison ... It's a little complicated, but here's
the idea. Look at the terms in which n is a perfect square.

(Write (1/2)√n as 2-√n to simplify things.)

For n = 1,2,3: 2-√1 ≥ 2-√n . There are 3 of these.

For n = 4, … 8: 2-√4 ≥ 2-√n . There are 5 of these.

For n = 9, … 15: 2-√9 ≥ 2-√n . There are 7 of these.

For n = 16, … 24: 2-√16 ≥ 2-√n . There are 9 of these.

See the pattern?
 
(1/2)^sqrt(x) is a positive decreasing function so you can use the integral test by just showing the integral from some point to infinity is finite, like SammyS also suggested. You can integrate it. It's just an integration by parts after you substitute x=u^2.
 
Last edited:
SammyS said:
A possible comparison ... It's a little complicated, but here's
the idea. Look at the terms in which n is a perfect square.

(Write (1/2)√n as 2-√n to simplify things.)

For n = 1,2,3: 2-√1 ≥ 2-√n . There are 3 of these.

For n = 4, … 8: 2-√4 ≥ 2-√n . There are 5 of these.

For n = 9, … 15: 2-√9 ≥ 2-√n . There are 7 of these.

For n = 16, … 24: 2-√16 ≥ 2-√n . There are 9 of these.

See the pattern?
Heh, yeah, in the time in-between your posts, this approach is actually the one I had taken, but it's good to see a confirmation that it is the right one. Basically, if I didn't mess it up, it should hold that \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty (\frac{1}{2})^{\sqrt{n}} \leq \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty (\frac{1}{2})^{n} + \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty (2n+1)(\frac{1}{2})^{n}, right?

Dick said:
(1/2)^sqrt(x) is a positive decreasing function so you can use the integral test by just showing the integral from some point to infinity is finite, like SammyS also suggested. You can integrate it. It's just an integration by parts after you substitute x=u^2.
Ah alright, when first thinking about the integral test at all, I think the particular integral just seemed too daunting too approach, but I see that perhaps next time I should just start plugging and chugging. I do like the comparison approach better, though :)

Brais said:
If I am not mistaken, it is a theorem that if the integral method works, then the sum converges in all cases, so you wouldn't need to prove the sum is smaller than the sum.
Good to know, although I probably couldn't use that directly, seeing as how we haven't mentioned it in class.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K