Show ZXZ/<1,1> is an infinite cyclic group.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

ZXZ/<1,1> is proven to be an infinite cyclic group, generated by the element <1,0>. The discussion clarifies that ZXZ is isomorphic to Z, confirming that the factor group ZXZ/<1,1> retains the properties of being infinite and cyclic. The identity element is (0,0), and the generator <1,1> is effectively modded out, leading to the conclusion that ZXZ/<1,1> is indeed cyclic and infinite.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically cyclic groups.
  • Familiarity with the notation and operations of direct sums in group theory.
  • Knowledge of isomorphisms and their implications in group structures.
  • Basic comprehension of cosets and factor groups.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of infinite cyclic groups in detail.
  • Learn about direct sums and their role in group theory.
  • Explore the concept of isomorphism in algebraic structures.
  • Investigate coset representatives and their significance in factor groups.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, group theorists, and anyone interested in the properties of cyclic groups and factor groups.

Daveyboy
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show ZXZ/<1,1> is an infinite cyclic group.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


<1,1> = {...(-1,-1), (0,0), (1,1),...}

implies ZXZ/<1,1> = {<1,0>+<1,1>, <0,1>+<1,1>} which is isomorphic to ZXZ.

But ZXZ is not cyclic, is my description of the factor group wrong , is it not isomorphic to ZXZ, or am I missing other points?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what characterize an infinite cyclic group?

1. generated by a single element
2. infinite order

can you put an element canonically into a certain form?
so say you have (m, n), what can I write it as?
 
if (m,n) is an element of one of the left cosets of the factor group then,
if m=n (m,n) is in <1,1>. if m/=n then (m,n) = (m,n) + <1,1>. (because (0,0) is
generated by <1,1>). I'm not sure what this implies though.
 
so actually <1,0> + <1,1> generated all elements of ZXZ. Is it acceptable to say ZXZ/<1,1> is isomorphic to Z+0Z which is isomorphic to Z? (Which is generated by <1> or <-1>)
 
<1,1> is just the identity. So, yeah.
 
... this is the additive group, (0,0) is the identity, and I'm using the notation <1,1> to imply that this is the cyclic generator. I hope that clears up any confusion.

I'm not sure if the conclusion I've come to is correct.

ZXZ/<1,1> = {Z+<1,1>}
Clearly Z is infinite and cyclic generated by <1> or <-1>.
So, ZXZ/<1,1> is a cyclic infinite group.
 
well, (0,0)=(1,1) since you are modding out the diagonal set.
(1,0) is the generator (or using coset notations (1,0)+<(1,1)>). Your conclusion is definitely correct (as in post 4)
 
awesome thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K