Showing a closed subspace of a Lindelöf space is Lindelöf

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion confirms that if A is a closed subspace of a Lindelöf space X, then A is also Lindelöf. The proof involves taking an open cover U for A, which consists of open sets in A that can be represented as intersections with open sets from X. By constructing an open cover for X that includes both X\A and the derived open sets U', it is established that a countable subcover exists, thus demonstrating that A retains the Lindelöf property.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lindelöf spaces in topology
  • Familiarity with open covers and subcovers
  • Knowledge of set intersections in topological spaces
  • Basic concepts of countability in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lindelöf spaces in more detail
  • Learn about open covers and their applications in topology
  • Explore the concept of countable subcovers and their significance
  • Investigate the implications of closed subspaces in various topological contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology, students studying advanced mathematical concepts, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of Lindelöf spaces and their properties.

radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,149
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



As the title says, one needs to show that if A is a closed subspace of a Lindelöf space X, then A is itself Lindelöf.

The Attempt at a Solution



Let U be an open covering for the subspace A. (An open covering for a set S is a collection of open sets whose union equals S, btw some define a cover for a set S as a collection such that S is contained in the union of these sets, it seems this causes disambiguity sometimes?)

Since all elements of U are open in A, they equal the intersection of some family of open sets with A, call it U'. Now, consider the open cover for X consisting of X\A and U'. By hypothesis, this cover has a countable subcover. Dismiss X\A from it, and then the intersection of the elements left in this collection with A form a countable open cover for A.

I hope this works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is 100% correct!

I'm aware that the notion of "cover" is sometimes defined in another way. But this never causes any problems. The two notions are interchangeable.
 
Excellent! Finally a correct one. Thanks! :biggrin:

Now back to countably dense subsets.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
499
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K