Showing A={r in Q: r^3<2} is a Dedekind Cut

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter samkolb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cut
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the set A = {r in Q: r^3 < 2} is a Dedekind cut. The user establishes that A is a proper nonempty subset of Q and satisfies the property that if r is in A and s < r, then s is also in A. They explore the existence of a rational number greater than 5/4 whose cube is less than 2, ultimately leading to a contradiction that implies the cube root of 2 is irrational. The user concludes that A contains no greatest rational, confirming that A is indeed a Dedekind cut.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dedekind cuts in the rational numbers (Q).
  • Familiarity with properties of rational numbers and inequalities.
  • Knowledge of cube roots and their implications in rationality.
  • Basic proof techniques, including proof by contradiction.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Dedekind cuts in detail.
  • Learn about the implications of irrational numbers, specifically cube roots.
  • Explore proof techniques in real analysis, focusing on proof by contradiction.
  • Investigate sequences and their convergence in the context of rational approximations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis and number theory, as well as educators looking to deepen their understanding of Dedekind cuts and rational numbers.

samkolb
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
How do I show that A={r in Q: r^3<2} is a Dedekind cut.


Here is the definition I am working with.

A subset A of Q is a Dedekind cut if and only if A satisfies the
following 3 properties:

(i) A is a proper nonempty subset of Q.
(ii) If r is in A, s in Q, and s<r, then s is in A.
(iii) A contains no greatest rational.

I showed that A satisfies (i) and (ii). I noticed that 5/4 is in A
and I tried to find a rational greater than 5/4 whose cube is less
than 2. I looked at the sequence (5n+1)/4n, and I found that n=26
works. That is, (4/5)<(131/104) and (131/104)^3 < 2.

So I think that if a/b is any rational with b>0 and (a/b)^3 < 2, then
there should be some positive integer n such that [(an+1)/bn]^3 < 2. But I don't know
how to show that this n exists.

I tried contradiction:
Let a/b be in A with b>0 , and assume that [(an+1)/bn]^3 >= 2 for all
positive n. Then (a/b)^3 < 2 <= [(an+1)/bn]^3 for all positive n. I
think this may imply that 2^(1/3) is rational, which I know is not true.

Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would start with some specific numbers. Since the cube root of 2 is approximately 1.26 (from a calculator) note that 1.253= 1.953125< 2 so 1.25 is in the set. On the other hand 1.263= 2.000376> 2 so 1.26 is not in the set.

The point of that is that any r in the set that is less than 1.25 has 1.25 larger so if there were a largest member it would have to be between 1.25 and 1.26. Let \delta= 2- x^3. Since 1.253= 1.953125, \delta&lt; 2- 1.95325= 0.045875.

Now, try to find some number, n (a positive integer just for simplicity) so that (x+ \delta/n)^3= x^3+ 3(\delta/n)x^2+ 3(\delta/n)^2 x+ (\delta/n)^3= x^3+ \delta(3x^2/n+ 3\delta x/n^2+ \delta^2/n^3)&lt; 2
Remembering the bounds on the sized for x and \delta that should be easy.

Proof by contradiction: Suppose there were some number, x, which were the largest member of {x| x3< 2}. That, as above, 1.25&lt; x&lt; 1.27
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K