Showing the integral of z^n around any smooth curve = 0.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the integral of \( z^n \) around any closed smooth path equals zero for any integer \( n \) not equal to -1. The context includes considerations of Cauchy's Integral Theorem and the behavior of the function \( z^n \) based on the value of \( n \).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of Cauchy's Integral Theorem, particularly for cases where \( n \) is positive versus negative. There are attempts to express the integral in terms of polar coordinates and questions about the analyticity of the involved functions. Some participants express confusion regarding the case when \( n = -1 \) and the behavior of the integral in that scenario.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. There is recognition of the need to handle the case of \( n = -1 \) separately, and some participants are beginning to clarify their understanding of the integral's behavior for different values of \( n \). Guidance has been offered regarding the integration process and the periodic nature of trigonometric functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the integral's definition may be affected by the path chosen, particularly in relation to the origin when \( n \) is negative. There is also mention of previous problems that inform the current understanding of the integral's behavior.

mancini0
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello everyone. I'm trying to finish the following problem:

Show that [tex]\int[/tex]z^n dz = 0 for any closed smooth path and any integer not equal to -1. [If n is negative, assume that γ does not pass through the origin, since otherwise the integral is not defined.]

Homework Equations



Cauchy's Integral Theorem states that the integral of all simple closed curves around an analytic region is zero.

Cauchy's Theorem.

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I recognize that if n>0, z^n is analytic everywhere (entire) and Cauchy's Integral Theorem yields the desired result.

My trouble arises when n is negative. By the problem statement, I must only consider n not equal to -1. I plan on using a circle (call it "C1" )as my path of integration, somehow arrive at the conclusion that the integral of z^n with (n<0, n does not = 1) is always zero, then apply Cauchy's Theorem to extend that result to any smooth curve C2. But when n is negative, z^n is not analytic, and Cauchy's Integral Theorem does not apply.

Can I proceed as follows?

Let z =re^i[tex]\theta[/tex]
then z^n = r^n *e^in[tex]\theta[/tex]
Now pull the r^n in front of the integral, leaving

(r^n)[tex]\oint[/tex]e^in[tex]\theta[/tex] d[tex]\theta[/tex]

Hmmm...Perhaps I can say e^in[tex]\theta[/tex] is analytic since the exponential is never zero. Is this correct? What trouble arises when n=-1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shucks... the exponential is analytic everywhere, so I can use Cauchy's Integral Theorem. :0
 
mancini0 said:
Shucks... the exponential is analytic everywhere, so I can use Cauchy's Integral Theorem. :0

It's not that simple. r isn't analytic and neither is theta. You should really figure out what's wrong with the n=(-1) case. Integrate around the unit circle for general n. Then use that the only place 1/z^n isn't analytic is the origin.
 
Thank you. The fact that theta and r are not analytic follow from the fact that theta and r are functions of z = x+iy. That thought was bothering me. When n = -1, my problem is that I calculate the integral of z^-1 dz to in fact be zero, when z = re^i*theta. But a previous problem showed me that the integral of (z-w)^-1 dz around a unit circle centered on w is 2(pi)i.
 
mancini0 said:
Thank you. The fact that theta and r are not analytic follow from the fact that theta and r are functions of z = x+iy. That thought was bothering me. When n = -1, my problem is that I calculate the integral of z^-1 dz to in fact be zero, when z = re^i*theta. But a previous problem showed me that the integral of (z-w)^-1 dz around a unit circle centered on w is 2(pi)i.

I don't get z^(-1)*dz around the unit circle to be zero. Use z=e^(i*theta). Find dz in terms of d(theta). Integrate for theta from 0 to 2*pi.
 
Yikes. I made an elementary mistake in taking the derivative of e^i*theta. Then the integral reduces to the integral of i d(theta) from theta = 0 to theta = 2pi, which is 2(pi)i.
 
mancini0 said:
Yikes. I made an elementary mistake in taking the derivative of e^i*theta. Then the integral reduces to the integral of i d(theta) from theta = 0 to theta = 2pi, which is 2(pi)i.

Ok. Now you're getting it. Try z^n where n<1.
 
Okay, for example suppose n = -2. Then integrating (e^i*theta)^-2 from 0 to 2pi gives me zero, as desired. I suppose I could use mathematical induction from here on out?
 
mancini0 said:
Okay, for example suppose n = -2. Then integrating (e^i*theta)^-2 from 0 to 2pi gives me zero, as desired. I suppose I could use mathematical induction from here on out?

How did you get n=(-2) to be zero? You really don't need induction. You just need that the integral of cos(k*theta) and sin(k*theta) from 0 to 2*pi is zero with k an integer unless k=0, don't you? It's elementary integration. And using the trig functions are periodic.
 
  • #10
I meant the integral of z^n dz, which should be 0 by the problem statement. Somebody get this man a Field's Medal! Thanks for your help.
 
  • #11
By Cauchy's theorem, it is sufficient to integrate around the circle with center at 0 and radius R. On such a circle, [itex]z= Re^{i\theta}[/itex] so that [itex]dz= ri e^{i\theta}d\theta[/itex]. The integral is
[tex]\oint z^n dz= \int_0^{2\pi} (R^ne^{ni\theta})(Re^{i\theta}d\theta[/tex]
[tex]= R^{n+1} \int_0^{2\pi} e^{(n+1)i\theta}d\theta[/tex]

Now, just do that integral. Note that you will have to do the cases [itex]n= -1[/itex] and [itex]n\ne -1[/itex] separately.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K