MHB Showing the “only if” direction of equality in a complex equality

  • Thread starter Thread starter kalish1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Direction
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the "only if" direction of the equality |z_1 + z_2 + ... + z_n| = |z_1| + |z_2| + ... + |z_n|, specifically under the condition that z_k/z_ℓ ≥ 0 for any integers k and ℓ where z_ℓ ≠ 0. The initial approach involves using induction and the triangle inequality, but confusion arises in applying these concepts. A simpler method suggested is to reverse the reasoning, starting from the desired equality and working backwards. Ultimately, the necessary condition for equality is that the complex numbers involved must be collinear, reinforcing the requirement that their ratios remain non-negative.
kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
*How can I finish off the "only if" direction? I am just unable to prove the only if direction! Using the induction hypothesis and the triangle inequality is confusing me for some reason.*

Show that
\begin{equation}
|z_1+z_2+\dots+z_n| = |z_1| + |z_2| + \dots + |z_n|
\end{equation}
if and only if $z_k/z_{\ell} \ge 0$ for any integers $k$ and $\ell$, $\ell \leq k, \ell \leq n,$ for which $z_{\ell} \ne 0.$

We show the "if" direction first. Suppose that $z_k/z_{\ell} \ge 0.$ Without loss of generality, suppose that $z_1$ is nonzero. Otherwise, we could reduce to $|z_2+\dots+z_n| = |z_2| + \dots + |z_n|$, where $z_2, \dots, z_n$ are all nonzero. Then we have:
\begin{align*}
|z_1+z_2+\dots+z_n| \ &= |z_1|\left|1+\dfrac{z_2}{z_1}+\dots+\dfrac{z_n}{z_1}\right| \\
&= |z_1|\left(1+\dfrac{z_2}{z_1}+\dots+\dfrac{z_n}{z_1}\right) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathrm{Since} \ \dfrac{z_i}{z_1} \ge 0 \\
&=|z_1|\left(1+\left|\dfrac{z_2}{z_1}\right|+\dots+\left|\dfrac{z_n}{z_1}\right|\right) \\
&=|z_1|\left(1+\dfrac{|z_2|}{|z_1|}+\dots+\dfrac{|z_n|}{|z_1|}\right)=|z_1| + |z_2| + \dots + |z_n|
\end{align*}
To show the "only if" direction, we use induction. For $n=2$, we want to
find a condition for which $|z_1+z_2|=|z_1|+|z_2|.$ From the book and class discussions, we see that equality occurs if $z_1$ and $z_2$ are collinear. Provided the valid assumption of $z_2 \ne 0,$ we have that a necessary and sufficient condition, for which $|z_1+z_2|=|z_1|+|z_2|$, is $z_1/z_2 \ge 0.$

*Thanks!*
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no need to use induction, just start at the bottom and work backwards.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K