Sign hanging from massless beam attached to hinge supported by string

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of a sign hanging from a massless beam attached to a hinge, emphasizing the importance of accurately defining variables and equations in torque calculations. Participants highlight the necessity of using LaTeX for clarity in mathematical expressions and the need for clear diagrams that are not overly compressed. Key issues include the mislabeling of forces in the free body diagram (FBD) and the incorrect application of torque equations related to the sign's weight. Participants stress the importance of maintaining consistent variable naming and ensuring that all equations are numbered for easy reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and moments in physics
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams (FBD)
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for typesetting equations
  • Knowledge of vector resolution techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of torque and equilibrium in static systems
  • Learn how to create accurate free body diagrams (FBD)
  • Practice writing equations in LaTeX for clarity and precision
  • Explore vector resolution methods and their applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and mechanics who are involved in analyzing static systems and require a solid understanding of torque and free body diagrams.

hisiks
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A uniform sign of weight W and width 2L hangs from a massless horizontal beam, hinged at the
wall and supported by a cable. (a) Determine the tension in the cable. (b) Determine the
components of the reaction force at the hinge in terms of W, L, d and ϴ (c) Find the minimum
possible friction force between the hinge and the wall that will allow this set-up in terms of W, L,
d and ϴ assuming that the hinge is not attached to the wall mechanically
Relevant Equations
Sum of Torques = 0
Sum of Forces = 0
Trig Equations
F=ma
Torque = Fdcos theta
Attempted creating equations for zeros of torque and components of forces in x and y as seen in picture. Got lost with having only variables and the d & 2L for the length of the beam. Not sure how to do the question with two points of contact between the beam and the sign. Is the center center of mass changed because of that and/or what's the distance I use for that part?
 

Attachments

  • 74A362C4-6D5C-4092-88FD-76002827F4E3.jpeg
    74A362C4-6D5C-4092-88FD-76002827F4E3.jpeg
    68.7 KB · Views: 210
  • EDC8B2E0-1866-4C43-9DD5-E9DFEF3F161D.jpeg
    EDC8B2E0-1866-4C43-9DD5-E9DFEF3F161D.jpeg
    38.5 KB · Views: 154
Physics news on Phys.org
Your diagram is too small to be able to read the details. If I expand it it just gets fuzzy. Make the original half a page and don’t try to cram working into the same image.

Per forum rules, working should be typed in, preferably in LaTeX, not in an image. That makes it easier to refer to specific equations when making comments. Very clear writing and numbered equations is just acceptable, but your handwriting does nor qualify. Mine wouldn't either. I really cannot read it well enough to relate the variables to the diagram.

And do try to ensure the images are upright!

When writing moments equations, always state the axis.
 
haruspex said:
Your diagram is too small to be able to read the details. If I expand it it just gets fuzzy. Make the original half a page and don’t try to cram working into the same image.

Per forum rules, working should be typed in, preferably in LaTeX, not in an image. That makes it easier to refer to specific equations when making comments. Very clear writing and numbered equations is just acceptable, but your handwriting does nor qualify. Mine wouldn't either. I really cannot read it well enough to relate the variables to the diagram.

And do try to ensure the images are upright!

When writing moments equations, always state the axis.
Understandable, that was just my quickly written first attempt, here's a clearer process.
 
hisiks said:
Understandable, that was just my quickly written first attempt, here's a clearer process.
 

Attachments

  • 49320BFC-14FC-4AB7-AC6E-D456AD1F8E9E.jpeg
    49320BFC-14FC-4AB7-AC6E-D456AD1F8E9E.jpeg
    26.4 KB · Views: 141
  • 3D665438-1AA5-4FFE-A515-9448C163BB26.jpeg
    3D665438-1AA5-4FFE-A515-9448C163BB26.jpeg
    34.6 KB · Views: 148
Your diagrams are sideways
 
erobz said:
Your diagrams are sideways
... again
 
hisiks said:
Understandable, that was just my quickly written first attempt, here's a clearer process.
You have two versions of the torque the sign's weight exerts on the hinge, one with Wd, one with ##W\frac{d+2L}2##.
They're both wrong.

(When I said to number all equations, if you won't type them, I meant all.)
 
20221127.jpg


20221127b.jpeg


20221127a.jpg
 
You have 3 things labelled T on the diagram. My red pencil would strike instantly.
 
  • #10
Welcome, @hisiks !

Regarding your free body diagram (FBD):
You have assigned the variable T to three different forces.
You have assigned the variable F to the reaction forces at the pivot, which are normally identified as R.
Tx and Ty are understood as forces; therefore, it results confusing to see FTx and FTy in your equations.

You don't need to split the weight of the sign in two, for the moment induced by the weight, the application distance of that force is at the center point of the sign, regardless of how it hangs from the bar.
Please, try the FBD and associate equations again.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
  • #11
Also, it is a good habit to cross out any vector that you resolve into components, e.g. FH, to avoid double-counting or else just draw the two components.

Also your equation (4) is an identity and says T = T, nothing new.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and Lnewqban

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K