Silly question about units of Momentum Density from NG Action

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the units of momentum density as derived from the Nambu-Goto Action in string theory, specifically from Zweibach's "A First Course in String Theory." The term \(\mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}\) is identified as momentum density, leading to confusion regarding its units. The original poster expects \(\mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}\) to have units of mass divided by time or units of momentum, but concludes it has units of mass times length. A response clarifies that the momentum density should indeed have units of mass per time (M/T), aligning with the definition of momentum as mass times velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and density concepts
  • Familiarity with dimensional analysis in physics
  • Knowledge of string theory fundamentals
  • Proficiency in interpreting mathematical expressions in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Nambu-Goto Action in detail to understand its implications in string theory
  • Learn about Lagrangian density and its applications in classical mechanics
  • Explore dimensional analysis techniques in theoretical physics
  • Investigate the relationship between momentum, mass, and velocity in various physical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those studying string theory, as well as educators teaching Lagrangian mechanics and dimensional analysis.

benbenny
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Ok, I am thinking that I should probably move this to the Coursework area. I am not sure how to do that or if I even can...

My bad...Excuse the question but I am stuck on this for the past hour.

I studying Zweibach's "A first Course in String Theory". From the Nambu-Goto Action he derives the wave equation which consists of the term

\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{X} ^{\mu}} &= -\frac{T_{0}}{c}\frac{\dot{X} \cdot X')X'_{\mu}-(x')^{2}\dot{X}_{\mu}} {\sqrt{(\dot{X} \cdot X')^{2} - (\dot{X})^{2}(X')^{2}}} \equiv \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}

Now this \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu} is referred to as the momentum density and is used as such later on in the book:

p_\mu(\tau) = \int ^{\sigma _{1}}_{0} \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}(\tau , \sigma) d\sigma

Im confused because I would expect \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu} to have units of Mass divided by time, if \sigma has units of length, or units of momentum, if \sigma is dimensionless, so that when you integrate over \sigma you get units of momentum.

But as far as I can see \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu} has units of mass times length. I get this because the lagrangian density has units of ML^2/T and it is differentiated with respect to velocity, thus it takes units of ML.

Can someone help with this?

Thanks.

B
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct me if I'm wrong, but since you're not doing functional differentiation, I expect your L to be the Lagranian density in one dimension. Since a string is one-dimensional, this is

energy/length = (ML^2/T^2)/L = ML/T^2

The differentiated L on your left (momentum density) side would then have dimension

(ML/T^2) / (L/T) = M/T

Total momentum, integrated along the string length would have dimension

(M/T)*L = M*L/T

which seems right, knowing that momentum can be expressed as mass*velocity.

Torquil
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K