Simple and pedantic question about a problem involving q=it

  • Thread starter Thread starter s3a
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the equation q = i × t in the context of a problem involving charge (q) and time (t). Participants are examining the implications of the notation q(0-) = 0 as presented in the problem's solution.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the meaning of q(0-) = 0, particularly whether it implies that charge is assumed to be zero for any time less than zero. There is exploration of the significance of focusing on the immediate moment before t = 0 versus other moments before that time.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various interpretations and considerations regarding continuity and the assumptions made in the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the simplification of the equation and the implications of ignoring values less than t = 0.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem's assumptions and the implications of continuity in physical systems, noting that the treatment of charge prior to t = 0 may affect the analysis.

s3a
Messages
828
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


The problem and solution are attached as TheProblemAndSolution.jpeg.

Homework Equations


q = i × t

The Attempt at a Solution


For part (b), I just wanted to ask:
What does q(o-) = 0 (which is at the bottom of the solution) mean? Is the author trying to say ##q(0^{-}) = 0## in the sense that he or she is trying to say that he or she is assuming that q = 0 for any t < 0?

Any input would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • TheProblemAndSolution.jpeg
    TheProblemAndSolution.jpeg
    37.6 KB · Views: 510
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it means, more generally, that q=0 immediately before t=0. Thus it is realistic that at t=0, q=0.
What would happen if q>0 immediately preceding the time interval? You might need something like q(t) = q_0 + it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Thanks for the response.

Why did the author focus only on the immediate moment before t = 0 instead of any moment before t = 0, though?

Is there some kind of significance to ignoring values less than t = 0 that aren't the immediate moment before t = 0?
 
Last edited:
I think it may have to do with some continuity requirement.
 
Even if you're not 100% sure, could you please be more specific as to what you're thinking? Perhaps what you're thinking could be just what I need to get the epiphany I'm looking for.
 
As with most things, q = i*t is likely a simplification of something like q(t) = q_0+ i*t. The i*t piece is clearly 0 at t=0, and most physical systems require continuity. To that end, it doesn't matter what the system was doing in negative time, as long as it was zeroed out before this time interval started. If there were a charge present at t=0-, then some of that charge would be carried into the time interval we are interested in.
 
So, that assumption is just used to ignore and not have to use a y-intercept, in order to simplify the equation?
 
Yes.
 
Okay, I get it now. :)

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K