Simple Canon Question (Conservation Of Momentum): Frame of Reference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of momentum and the correct application of reference frames in physics. The user initially derived the velocity of an object relative to the ground (Vbg) incorrectly, leading to a discrepancy with the teacher's answer key. The correct formulation involves recognizing the direction of velocities and correctly applying the momentum equation: 0 = MbVbg + McVcg. The final correct calculation yields Vcg = -2.9 m/s, confirming the teacher's answer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum principles
  • Familiarity with reference frames in physics
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
  • Knowledge of vector directionality in motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the conservation of momentum equations
  • Learn about vector addition and subtraction in physics
  • Explore examples of relative motion in different reference frames
  • Review common mistakes in sign conventions in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and momentum, as well as educators looking for clarification on common misconceptions in reference frame applications.

Kermit_the_Phrog
Messages
22
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
In Fig below, a mobile cannon of mass M=1300 Kg fires a ball of mass m=72 kg in the positive direction of an x axis, at velocity Vbc= 55 m/s relative to cannon. Because of the firing, the cannon recoils (moves) with velocity Vcg relative to the ground. What are the magnitude and direction of Vcg?
Relevant Equations
Pi=Pf
Canon, Dumb.png

Since Pi = Pf,

0 = MbVbg + McVcg

I just need to express Vbg in terms of Vbc and Vcg (that is, I need to express the velocity of the ball relative to the ground in terms that I know/want to solve for):

by reference frames:

Vbc = Vbg + Vcg
so Vbg = Vbc -Vcg

Now I can sub in and solve

0 = MbVbg + McVcg
0 = Mb(Vbc -Vcg) + McVcg
0 = MbVbc - MbVcg +McVcg
MbVcg - McVcg = MbVbc
Vcg(Mb - Mc) = MbVbc

therefore,
Vcg = 72*55/(72-1300)
= -3.2 m/s
which would be a.

HOWEVER the teacher's answer key states that the answer is b, -2.9 m/s.
this answer is obtained if the denominator was " (- mb - mc) ".

Thus, did I just mess up somewhere with my signs? I can't find mistake, and any help deducing this would be appreciated, as I was pretty confident about my answer until seeing that it was wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kermit_the_Phrog said:
Thus, did I just mess up somewhere with my signs?

Yes. The signs are inconsistent between the two equations

0 = MbVbg + McVcg
Vbg = Vbc -Vcg

Give it some more thought.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kermit_the_Phrog
TSny said:
Yes. The signs are inconsistent in the two equations

0 = MbVbg + McVcg
Vbg = Vbc -Vcg

Give it some more thought.

Is the momentum equation supposed to be0 = MbVbg - McVcg

Because Vcg is pointed in the opposite direction to Vbg?
 
TSny said:
Give it some more thought.

If that's true, you get

Vcg = MbVbc/(Mb+Mc)
= 72*55/(72+1300)
= 2.9

which is then negative through intuition (since its moving in the opposite direction?)

Though i suppose this works, I feel like there's a better / more accurate way to show the signs in my algebra.

Thoughts?
 
Kermit_the_Phrog said:
Is the momentum equation supposed to be0 = MbVbg - McVcg

Because Vcg is pointed in the opposite direction to Vbg?
Assuming you are taking right as positive in all cases, your original momentum equation was correct.
In writing relative motion equations, the safest approach is always to write them in the form
Motion of A relative to B = Motion of A relative to common frame - Motion of B relative to common frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kermit_the_Phrog
haruspex said:
Assuming you are taking right as positive in all cases, your original momentum equation was correct.
In writing relative motion equations, the safest approach is always to write them in the form
Motion of A relative to B = Motion of A relative to common frame - Motion of B relative to common frame.

Ah so if its the other equation, I was wrong initially

so at first it would be:
Vbc = Vbg - Vcg

meaning
Vbg = Vbc + Vcg

Then the rest is the same:

0 = MbVbg + McVcg
0 = Mb(Vbc + Vcg) +McVcg
0 = MbVbc + MbVcg +McVcg
Vcg = -MbVbc/(Mb+Mc)
= -72*55/(72+1300)
= -2.9m/s

And THATS correct

So it was just a dumb mistake with the first reference frame equation

Thank you for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 126 ·
5
Replies
126
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
934
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K