Simple conceptual reference frame question

AI Thread Summary
When a train decelerates while a bed remains stationary on top, the bed appears to accelerate in the opposite direction due to the train's change in velocity. This phenomenon is explained by the concept of frames of reference, where the bed's motion is observed relative to the decelerating train. The deceleration of the train is typically measured against an inertial frame, such as the track, while the bed's apparent acceleration is relative to the accelerating train. Understanding this requires clarifying the reference points for both the train's deceleration and the bed's acceleration. This discussion highlights the importance of defining frames of reference in physics to grasp motion dynamics accurately.
Rubberduck2005
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
If a train is moving at some constant V with a bed sitting still on top. When the train decelerates at some rate -A then the bed will move at some acceleration A. I can't seem to get an intuition for how this comes to be. I have looked online and find no help.
Relevant Equations
none
If a train is moving at some constant V with a bed sitting still on top. When the train decelerates at some rate -A then the bed will move at some acceleration A. I can't seem to get an intuition for how this comes to be. I have looked online and find no help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems pretty straightforward.

If you're sitting on top of the train, what do you see the (wheeled) bed do ?
 
Rubberduck2005 said:
If a train is moving at some constant V with a bed sitting still on top. When the train decelerates at some rate -A then the bed will move at some acceleration A.
One assumes that you are learning about "frames of reference".

When you say that the train is decelerating, you should further qualify that statement. What is that deceleration relative to? Probably you mean that the deceleration is relative to an inertial frame in which the track is at rest.

When you say that the bed is accelerating, you should further qualify that statement. What is that acceleration relative to? Probably you mean that the deceleration is relative to an accelerating frame of reference in which the train is at rest.

The bed seems to be accelerating because the coordinate system you are measuring its acceleration against is itself accelerating.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top