High School Simple Derivation Of Euler's Formula And Applications

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion presents a straightforward derivation of Euler's formula, e^(ia) = cos(a) + i*sin(a), using concepts from pre-calculus and calculus. The derivation begins with a small segment of a unit circle and employs the properties of complex numbers and Euler's number, e. The author demonstrates how the rotation of a complex number through an angle can be expressed as (1 + ib/n)^n, leading to the conclusion that e^(ib) represents a rotation in the complex plane. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts intuitively before delving into more rigorous mathematical frameworks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic knowledge of complex numbers
  • Understanding of Euler's number, e
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions
  • Concepts of calculus, specifically derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of holomorphic functions in complex analysis
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of complex numbers
  • Explore the derivation of trigonometric identities using complex numbers
  • Investigate the applications of Euler's formula in electrical engineering and physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and complex analysis, as well as anyone interested in the applications of Euler's formula in various scientific fields.

Messages
10,968
Reaction score
3,838
Here is a simple way to get Euler's relation for those learning pre-calculus/calculus, so the trigonometric addition formula and the derivative of sine and cosine are easy. We will assume some basic knowledge of complex numbers and properties of Euler's number, e.

Consider a small segment of a unit circle with a small angle b at the origin in the complex plane. Draw a line from the ends of the radius of the small arc. You will notice since the angle is small, the line is very close to a tangent of the circle of length b, with it getting better as b gets smaller, i.e. it is at right angles to the radius and of length b. Consider b so small for all practical purposes (don't you love that in non-rigorous calculus) it is at right angles to the radius and length b. Being at right angles means it is multiplied by ib. So take the lower radius of the arc, multiply it by (1+ib), and get the upper radius, i.e. you have rotated it through an angle b. Take any angle b. Divide it by a large number n, and you get (1 +ib/n)^n rotates a complex number through an angle b. You may already know that (1+ ib/n)^n, when n is large, is e^ib, but I will prove it.

d(e^ib)/db = ie^ib or (e^(ib + idb) - e^(ib))/db = ie^(ib). So e^(idb) - 1 = idb. e^(idb) = 1 + idb. Hence e^(ib) = e^(n*ib/n) = (e^(ib/n))^n. If n is large b/n is small so we have e^(ib) = (1+ ib/n)^n.

Hence e^(ib) = e^(ib)*1. This means 1 on the real line of the complex plane is rotated through the angle b. But a complex number of length 1 at an angle a to the real line is cos(a) + i*sine(a).

We have thus shown Eulers famous relation e^(ia) = cos(a) + i*sine(a).

Simply differentiate it and you get ie^(ia) = d(cos(a))/da + i*d(sine(a))/da and we get d(cos(a))/da = sine (a) and d(sine(a))/da = --cos (a).

It is easy to use e^i(a+b) = e^(ia)*e^(ib) to get the formula for sine(a+b) and cos(a+b) and will be left as an exercise for the reader.

Compare how easy deriving these formulas are to the usual way found in textbooks. You can see the real power of complex numbers and why it is so important in mathematics. Textbooks could include these slightly difficult topics that often take pages to prove and make them simple, short and transparent. And the other issue I harp on about - really, people should do calculus and precalculus simultaneously.

BTW this is non-rigorous or intuitive calculus. To make it fully rigorous, you need complex analysis, holomorphic functions and all that. But everyone has to start somewhere.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes stevendaryl and scottdave
Physics news on Phys.org
Very neat.

For what it's worth, you can approximately get the derivatives of cosine and sine just from that triangle you drew at the start for a small rotation.

The line between ##(\cos(\theta),sin(\theta))## and ##(\cos(\theta+\epsilon),\sin(\theta+\epsilon))## is orthogonal to the radius of the circle so is proportional to ##(-\sin(\theta),\cos(\theta))##.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K