MHB Simple Harmonic Motion: 5kg Particle Suspended by 500 N/m String

AI Thread Summary
A 5 kg particle suspended by a 500 N/m elastic string exhibits simple harmonic motion when pulled down 20 cm from its equilibrium position and released. The elastic force is proportional to the displacement from the equilibrium, confirming the motion's harmonic nature. The equilibrium condition shows that the gravitational force equals the elastic force at the equilibrium position. The net force acting on the particle, derived from the elastic force minus the gravitational force, is proportional to the displacement from equilibrium. Thus, the particle's motion can be classified as simple harmonic motion.
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
A particle of mass 5 kg is suspended from a fixed point by a light elastic string
which hangs vertically. The elastic constant of the string is 500 N/m.
The mass is pulled down a vertical distance of 20 cm from the equilibrium
position and is then released from rest.
(i) Show that the particle moves with simple harmonic motion.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
A particle of mass 5 kg is suspended from a fixed point by a light elastic string
which hangs vertically. The elastic constant of the string is 500 N/m.
The mass is pulled down a vertical distance of 20 cm from the equilibrium
position and is then released from rest.
(i) Show that the particle moves with simple harmonic motion.

Hi markosheehan! ;)

An elastic string provides a force that is linear with the displacement from the rest position.
As a consequence we have simple harmonic motion.
If we want to prove it, we have to set up the equation of motion and solve it.
Care to give it a try?

For the record, we expect some kind of attempt or explanation where you're stuck, if only to figure out how to help you best.
 
what i tryed to do was find the force down and the force up find the resultant force and let it equal to F=5a and then that would prove it but to do this when i am finding the force in the string i need the natural length of the string but it is not given in the question. to find the force up i use F=k(length-natural length)
 
markosheehan said:
what i tryed to do was find the force down and the force up find the resultant force and let it equal to F=5a and then that would prove it but to do this when i am finding the force in the string i need the natural length of the string but it is not given in the question. to find the force up i use F=k(length-natural length)

We don't need the natural length.
When the string has its natural length, the elastic force is zero.
The elastic force is proportional with the change in its natural length.

So let's start with the position in equilibrium.
Then the force of gravity is equal and opposite the elastic force.
That is:
$$F_g = F_e \quad\Rightarrow\quad mg = k\Delta y \quad\Rightarrow\quad 50 = 500 \Delta y\quad\Rightarrow\quad \Delta y = 0.10 \text{ m}$$

Now initially we pull the mass $20 \text{ cm}$ down and we let go.
Then we have:
$$F_{net} = F_e - F_g = ky-mg = 500y-50 = 500(y-0.10)$$

In other words, the net force is proportional to the distance from the equilibrium position.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Back
Top