Simple harmonic motion finding velocity trouble

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of a block undergoing simple harmonic motion (SHM) after being pushed downward from its equilibrium position. The block, with a mass of 6.6 kg, stretches a spring by 0.26 m and is initially given a velocity of 4.4 m/s. The correct velocity equation for this scenario is v = Awcos(wt), where 'A' is the amplitude and 'w' is the angular frequency. The confusion arises from the choice between using sine or cosine functions, which depends on the initial conditions set for time t = 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion (SHM)
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion for SHM
  • Knowledge of angular frequency calculation
  • Ability to interpret initial conditions in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of SHM equations, focusing on v = Awcos(wt) and v = -Awsin(wt)
  • Learn how to determine initial conditions in oscillatory motion problems
  • Explore examples of phase shifts in SHM and their impact on motion equations
  • Practice problems involving SHM with varying initial conditions and velocities
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and oscillatory motion, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of simple harmonic motion.

Eats Dirt
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block with mass m =6.6 kg is hung from a vertical spring. When the mass hangs in equilibrium, the spring stretches x = 0.26 m. While at this equilibrium position, the mass is then given an initial push downward at v = 4.4 m/s. The block oscillates on the spring without friction.


at time 0.39 s what is the speed of the block

Homework Equations



v= -Awsin(wt)

The Attempt at a Solution



i sub A= 0.716681695
w= 6.139406135
t= 0.39 into the equation and get 2.990262698

my calculator is on rads and i really don't understand what is going wrong in this calculation i found the other variables using the given values
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks to me that at t = 0s, the velocity is 4.4m/s.

But the equation that you are using i.e. v= -Awsin(wt)
is inconsistent with this because it gives v = 0 at t = 0,
 
grzz said:
It looks to me that at t = 0s, the velocity is 4.4m/s.

But the equation that you are using i.e. v= -Awsin(wt)
is inconsistent with this because it gives v = 0 at t = 0,

which equation did you use?
 
Eats Dirt said:
which equation did you use?

ok so you use cos instead but how do you know which one to use? the sin equation or the cos equation?
 
An equation consistent with the conditions of the problem is v = Awcos(wt)
 
It all depends at which point the time is taken as 0.
The displacement equation is x = Asinwt if the stopwatch is started at the equilibrium i.e.t = 0 at x = 0.

But the displacement is x = Acoswt if the stopwatch is started at the positive extreme end of the oscillation i.e. x = A when t = 0.

Then the corresponding equation for the velocity is used.
 
grzz said:
An equation consistent with the conditions of the problem is v = Awcos(wt)

yes but how would i know which one to use sin or cos? is there a general rule for telling which one should be used? or telling when there should be a phase shift etc?

thankyou for the help so far!
 
Sometimes the information given in the problem gives at which point in the shm the time t = 0. For example in the problem quoted, the mass is given a speed from the equilibrium position. And then one is asked to find something later on after that. So one can take t = 0 when the particle was at equilibrium i.e when displacement x = 0.

Otherwise one must make an assumption about at which point t = 0 and must remain consistent with that assumption.
 
grzz said:
Sometimes the information given in the problem gives at which point in the shm the time t = 0. For example in the problem quoted, the mass is given a speed from the equilibrium position. And then one is asked to find something later on after that. So one can take t = 0 when the particle was at equilibrium i.e when displacement x = 0.

Otherwise one must make an assumption about at which point t = 0 and must remain consistent with that assumption.

ok thankyou so much! although i am confused a little bit because when the box is pushed on the timer starts, is the block not at the equilibrium when it is pushed on in this problem?
 
  • #10
It WAS at equilibrium BEFORE t = 0 but then AT t = 0 it was given a velocity.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
842
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K