Simple Harmonic Motion Lab Question: Investigating the Period-Mass Relationship

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonesy3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic Lab
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a lab assignment investigating the period-mass relationship in simple harmonic motion using a spring-mass system. The equation T=2π√[(m+m(eff))/K] is utilized to calculate the period of oscillation for various masses, with experimental data showing discrepancies between calculated and observed periods. The average spring constant was determined to be 243.54 N/m, but issues arose due to unit inconsistencies and measurement methods. Participants emphasized the importance of using SI units and accurately defining equilibrium points in the experiment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion principles
  • Familiarity with the equation T=2π√[(m+m(eff))/K]
  • Knowledge of spring constant calculations and units (N/m)
  • Experience with graphing data and calculating percentage differences
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about unit conversions in physics experiments, specifically from grams to kilograms
  • Study the concept of effective mass in oscillatory systems
  • Explore methods for accurately measuring equilibrium positions in spring-mass experiments
  • Investigate the significance of error analysis in experimental physics
USEFUL FOR

Students conducting experiments in physics, particularly those focused on simple harmonic motion, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of lab methodologies and data analysis techniques.

jonesy3
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A lab I'm assigned concerning simple harmonic motion uses a simple spring attached to a mass system...it asks me to "investigate the period-mass relationship. determine the period of oscillation of your system for several different masses. Verify that your data is consistent with the predicted period mass relationship "T=2pi sqrt of [(m+m(eff))/K] Construct a graph of (period)^2 vs mass. Justify your conclusions. Employ % difference calculations where appropriate.


Homework Equations


My data was
mass 50.95g, went down 2.1cm from equilibrium, period=3.22 sec
mass 70.95g, went down 2.8 cm from equil, period=3.8 sec
mass 100.95, went down 4.0 cm from equil, period=4.04 sec
mass 120.95g, went down 4.9cm from equil, period=4.9sec
mass 140.95g, went down 5.7cm from equil, period=5.7sec


The Attempt at a Solution



Using f=-kx, i found the avg spring constant to be 243.54. I need to find the period of oscillation for all of the masses using the equation above and compare that to the period of oscillation I got in the actual experiment. I tested it out... so T=2pi (square root[50.95/242.6])...gives me T^2=1.32 or T=1.14... this is no where near 3.22sec which was my actual experimental result. The lab says that you should be getting within 1% error...is my data just very inaccurate or am I doing something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jonesy3 said:

Homework Statement


A lab I'm assigned concerning simple harmonic motion uses a simple spring attached to a mass system...it asks me to "investigate the period-mass relationship. determine the period of oscillation of your system for several different masses. Verify that your data is consistent with the predicted period mass relationship "T=2pi sqrt of [(m+m(eff))/K] Construct a graph of (period)^2 vs mass. Justify your conclusions. Employ % difference calculations where appropriate.


Homework Equations


My data was
mass 50.95g, went down 2.1cm from equilibrium, period=3.22 sec
mass 70.95g, went down 2.8 cm from equil, period=3.8 sec
mass 100.95, went down 4.0 cm from equil, period=4.04 sec
mass 120.95g, went down 4.9cm from equil, period=4.9sec
mass 140.95g, went down 5.7cm from equil, period=5.7sec


The Attempt at a Solution



Using f=-kx, i found the avg spring constant to be 243.54. I need to find the period of oscillation for all of the masses using the equation above and compare that to the period of oscillation I got in the actual experiment. I tested it out... so T=2pi (square root[50.95/242.6])...gives me T^2=1.32 or T=1.14... this is no where near 3.22sec which was my actual experimental result. The lab says that you should be getting within 1% error...is my data just very inaccurate or am I doing something wrong?

What do you mean by went down x cm from equilibrium? Did you hang the mass and measured the new equilibrium point relative to the equilibrium of the unloaded spring, or did you measure the amplitude of the oscillation relative to the loaded equilibrium?
 
I'd have to say be careful with units. The value for spring constant you have obtained is certainly not Newtons per meter. In your calculation you've used grams instead of kilograms. I'd recommend sticking with SI units. Plus have you measured frequency or time period in your experiment?
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K