Simple Harmonic Motion of a Mass Hanging from a Vertical Spring

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of displacement in simple harmonic motion for a mass hanging from a vertical spring, specifically using the equation (1/2)kx² = mgx. The user calculated a displacement of 30.32 m using values for mass (13.6 kg) and spring constant (8.8 N/m). However, the conclusion drawn was incorrect due to a misunderstanding of energy conservation principles, particularly that the elastic potential energy (EPE) does not decrease as the mass descends, and that mechanical work conservation does not imply equal loss in gravitational and elastic potential energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion principles
  • Familiarity with potential energy equations, specifically gravitational and elastic potential energy
  • Knowledge of spring constants and their role in oscillatory motion
  • Basic grasp of mechanical work conservation laws
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of simple harmonic motion and energy conservation
  • Study the relationship between gravitational potential energy and elastic potential energy in oscillatory systems
  • Learn about the effects of damping and friction on simple harmonic motion
  • Explore advanced topics in mechanics, such as the dynamics of oscillating systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of oscillatory systems and energy conservation principles.

momoneedsphysicshelp
Messages
23
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A 13.6 kg mass is placed on a vertically hanging spring (k=8.8). The mass is slowly released so it comes to rest. What is the displacement from the natural length of the spring?
Relevant Equations
Gravitational potential energy = m*g*x
Elastic potential energy = (1/2)kx^2
Assuming zero spring mass and zero friction,
At the greatest value of x, the loss in gravitational potential energy should equal the loss in elastic potential energy.

so I did

(1/2)kx^2=mgx

to isolate x in the formula,

x=(2mg)/k

then I plugged in my values so:

(2*13.6*9.81)/8.8= 30.3218

so the displacement is 30.32 m.

Can anyone please check what mistake I made in this problem, when I submit it, it is incorrect.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
momoneedsphysicshelp said:
At the greatest value of x, the loss in gravitational potential energy should equal the loss in elastic potential energy.
You mean the gain in EPE, but this scenario does not conserve work:
"The mass is slowly released"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
haruspex said:
You mean the gain in EPE, but this scenario does not conserve work:
"The mass is slowly released"
How come elastic potential energy will not decrease as the mass goes down?
 
It's slowly released until it comes to rest.

What can you say about the forces acting on it at this point, at rest?
 
rsk said:
It's slowly released until it comes to rest.

What can you say about the forces acting on it at this point, at rest?
decreasing gravitational potential energy
 
Forces, not energy. What can you say about the forces on an object which is at rest?
 
momoneedsphysicshelp said:
How come elastic potential energy will not decrease as the mass goes down?
Elastic potential energy of a spring is at minimum when the spring is relaxed. Compressing or stretching it increases the EPE according to ½kx2, where x is the change in length from the relaxed length.

Conservation of mechanical work means that work lost by one aspect (potential or kinetic) is gained by other aspects. There is no law that says the loss in one should equal the loss in another,
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
846
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K