Simple Harmonic Motion of a particle of mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle of mass constrained to move along the x-axis with a potential energy function defined as V(x) = a + bx + cx², where a, b, and c are positive constants. The discussion centers around the conditions under which the particle exhibits simple harmonic motion (SHM) when disturbed from its equilibrium position.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between acceleration and displacement in SHM, questioning how to establish the necessary proportionality. Some suggest shifting the reference system to better analyze the potential energy function and its implications for equilibrium.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the potential energy function and its relation to SHM. Some have suggested methods for shifting the origin to simplify the analysis, while others are working through the mathematical implications of these transformations.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the equilibrium position and the reference frame used in the analysis. Participants are also grappling with the mathematical complexities of the potential energy function and its derivatives.

Himanshu
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is constrained to move along the x-axis. The potential energy is given by, V (x) = a + bx + cx2, where a, b, c are positive constants. If the particle is disturbed slightly from its equilibrium position, then it follows that

(a) it performs simple harmonic motion with period 2pi*Sqrt(m/2c)
(b) it performs simple harmonic motion with period 2pi*Sqrt(ma/2b^2).
(c) it moves with constant velocity
(d) it moves with constant acceleration


Homework Equations



Force=-Gradient of V(x)
F=-(b+2cx)
a=-(b+2cx)/m
T=2pi*Sqrt(Displacement/Acceleration)


The Attempt at a Solution



I cannot proceed further. For an object to perform SHM 'a' should be proportional to -x. But how do I find this proportionality over the sum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shm

Dimensionally b/m must be an acceleraton. So you can write a + b/m = a' = -2c/m*x. So k becomes 2c/m.
 
Last edited:
The potential energy of a SHM oscillator is given by

[tex]U = 1/2 kx^2[/tex]

it therefore seems that for the given equation the origin is not situated at the equilibrium point of the oscillator. Maybe you should try and shift the reference system and see what you get.
 
andrevdh said:
The potential energy of a SHM oscillator is given by

[tex]U = 1/2 kx^2[/tex]

it therefore seems that for the given equation the origin is not situated at the equilibrium point of the oscillator. Maybe you should try and shift the reference system and see what you get.



On Shifting the origin to the vertex of the parabola I get the origin as (-b/2c, (b^2-4ac)/2c^2) with reference to the previous coordinate system. Therefore the abscissa x' in the new coordinate system is (x+b/2c).

On putting this value in the PE equation I get U=1/2 kx'^2=1/2 k(x+b/2c)^2. How do I proceed from here onwards?
 
Take c common from the equation, and write
V = c(a/c + b/c*x + x^2).You can wright this as c(x + alpha)^2 where alpha = b/2c and (alpha)^2 = a^2/c^2.
Now proceed using relevant euqations.
 
My maths are a bit rusty in this respect so I did it the long and hard way. I rewrote the original equation in terms of the shifted reference system (where the origin coincides with the position of minimum potenetial energy). That is

[tex]x = x_1 - \frac{b}{2c}[/tex]

that got me to

[tex]V(x_1) = a - \frac{3b^2}{4c} + cx_1^2[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K