Simple Harmonic Motion solution problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the solution to the Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM) equation, specifically transitioning from the standard form \(x = A_{real} \cos(\omega t) - A_{im} \sin(\omega t)\) to the desired form \(B \sin(\omega t + \phi)\). Participants confirm that values of \(B\) and \(\phi\) can always be found using the relationships \(B \cos(\phi) = A_{real}\) and \(B \sin(\phi) = A_{im}\). The discussion also highlights the use of trigonometric identities to facilitate this transformation, ensuring that the amplitude and phase can be accurately represented.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities, particularly \( \sin(x + y) \)
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their application in physics
  • Basic grasp of Simple Harmonic Motion concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the SHM equation from first principles
  • Explore the application of trigonometric identities in physics problems
  • Learn about the significance of phase and amplitude in wave mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between complex numbers and oscillatory motion
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics and wave motion, as well as educators seeking to deepen their understanding of Simple Harmonic Motion and its mathematical foundations.

Matuku
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I've been going through and proving to myself that the solution to the SHM equation is correct; at A level we were just told what it was but never really shown why.

I've gone through the problem as a standard 2nd Order ODE (with complex roots of course) and ended up at:

[tex]x = A_{real} cos(\omega t) - A_{im} sin(\omega t)[/tex]

But the form I want (as the one were were given) is [tex]Bsin(\omega t + \phi)[/tex]

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SimpleHarmonicMotion.html seems to imply that you can get:
[tex]B cos(\phi) = A_{real}[/tex]
[tex]B sin(\phi) = A_{im}[/tex]

Which then allows use of a trigonometric identity to get it to cos (still not quite what I want but you can just put an extra pi/2 into the phi and make it sin). Is this always the case? Can you always find values of B and [tex]\phi[/tex] which will allow this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Matuku said:
I've been going through and proving to myself that the solution to the SHM equation is correct; at A level we were just told what it was but never really shown why.

I've gone through the problem as a standard 2nd Order ODE (with complex roots of course) and ended up at:

[tex]x = A_{real} cos(\omega t) - A_{im} sin(\omega t)[/tex]

But the form I want (as the one were were given) is [tex]Bsin(\omega t + \phi)[/tex]

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SimpleHarmonicMotion.html seems to imply that you can get:
[tex]B cos(\phi) = A_{real}[/tex]
[tex]B sin(\phi) = A_{im}[/tex]

Which then allows use of a trigonometric identity to get it to cos (still not quite what I want but you can just put an extra pi/2 into the phi and make it sin). Is this always the case? Can you always find values of B and [tex]\phi[/tex] which will allow this?
[itex]sin(x+ y)= sin(x)cos(y)+ cos(x)sin(y) is the trigonometric identity you refer to. Of course, we must have [itex]sin^2(x)+ cos^2(x)= 1[/itex] but what you can do is this:<br /> <br /> Given [itex]A_{real} cos(\omega t)+ A_{imag}sin(\omega t)[/itex], if [itex]\sqrt{A^2_{real}+ A^2_{imag}}\ne 1[/itex], factor that out:<br /> [itex]\sqrt{A^2_{real}+ B^2_{imag}}\left(\frac{A_{real}}{\sqrt{A^2_{real}+ B^2_{imag}}}cos(\omega t)+ \frac{A_{imag}}{\sqrt{A^2_{real}+ B^2_{imag}}}sin(\omega t)\right)[/itex].<br /> <br /> And, now, because [itex]\left(\frac{A_{real}}{\sqrt{A^2_{real}+ B^2_{imag}}}\right)^2+ \frac{A_{imag}}{\frac{A_{real}}{\sqrt{A^2_{real}+ B^2_{imag}}}}= 1[/itex], we <b>can</b> find [itex]\phi[/itex] such that [itex]cos(\phi)= \frac{A_{real}}{\frac{A_{real}}{\sqrt{A^2_{real}+ B^2_{imag}}}}[/itex] and [itex]sin(\phi)= \frac{A_{imag}}{\frac{A_{real}}{\sqrt{A^2_{real}+ B^2_{imag}}}}[/itex] and thus, <br /> [tex]A_{real}cos(\omega t)+ A_{imag}sin(\omega t)=\sqrt{A^2_{real}+ A^2_{imag}}\left( sin(\phi)cos(\omega t)+ cos(\phi)sin(\omega t)\right)= \sqrt{A^2_{real}+ A^2_{imag}}sin(\omega t+ \phi)[/tex][/itex][tex][/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, that brings back memories from A level actually; let me see if I've got this right.

Let,
[tex]\]<br /> Acos(\theta) + Bsin(\theta) = Rsin(\theta + \phi)\\ <br /> \therefore Acos(\theta) + Bsin(\theta)=Rcos(\theta)sin(\phi) + Rsin(\theta)cos(\phi)\\ <br /> \therefore A = Rsin(\phi), B= Rcos(\phi)\\ <br /> \therefore R = sqrt{A^2 + B^2}, \phi=arctan(A/B)\\ <br /> \[[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K