Calculating Time Period of Simple Pendulum with Charged Capacitor | SHM Homework

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a simple pendulum with charge, mass, and effective length suspended between the plates of a charged capacitor. The objective is to determine the time period of oscillation while considering the effects of the electric field on the pendulum's motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the pendulum, including gravitational and electric forces, and their contributions to the effective gravitational acceleration. There are attempts to derive the time period using different expressions for effective gravity and restoring forces.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of the forces involved and their effects on the pendulum's motion. Some guidance has been offered regarding the role of tension and its relationship to restoring forces, but there remains some confusion about the contributions of different forces and their torques.

Contextual Notes

There is ongoing debate about the assumptions made regarding the direction of effective gravitational acceleration and the role of tension in the restoring force. Participants are also considering the implications of small angle approximations and the conditions under which simple harmonic motion applies.

Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


# A simple pendulum having charge q, mass m and effective length l is suspended from a rigid support between the plates of a charged capacitor whose plates are kept vertical. What is the time period of oscillation of the pendulum?



Homework Equations



Time period = 2(pi)[l/g’]^(1/2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved it in the following way:
Let x be the angular displacement at any instant. Let T be the tension in the string.
Restoring force(F) = -(mgsinx + qEcosx)
For small values of x,
F= -(mgx + qE)
But this won’t be a Simple harmonic motion. I am stuck here.
The solution as given in my book is as follows:
Tcosx = mg ---------(1)
Tsinx = qE ---------(2)
From (1) & (2),
T = [(mg)^2 + (qE)^2]^(1/2)
Effective g’= T/m
= [g^2 + (qE/m)^2]^(1/2)
Time period = 2(pi)[l/g’]^(1/2)
= 2(pi)[l/(g^2 + (qE/m)^2)^(1/2)]^(1/2)

As per them, the direction of effective g’ is inclined to the vertical by angle x. But effective g’ should be vertical, isn’t it? Does tension contribute to the restoring force experienced by the bob?I think it is the component of weight that contributes to the restoring force? But they haven’t used that concept at all to find the time period. Please help!
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    5.9 KB · Views: 428
Physics news on Phys.org
The weight of an object can be determined by hanging it from a spring scale. In such a case we say that the weight of the object is equal to the tension in the spring. The "effective g" would then be the tension in the spring divided by the mass hanging from it. (The derivation of the period of a simple pendulum is done under the assumption that the pendulum swings only slightly out of the bottom position, which means that the speed of the bob will be small resulting in a negligble centripetal acceleration - the tension therefore remains virtually the same).
 
Forces acting are F_e=qE and F_g=mg. Find the net acceleration due to the two forces and that will be your effective g. Then use that term instead of g in your expression for the time period.
 
Amith2006 said:

Homework Statement



Restoring force(F) = -(mgsinx + qEcosx)
For small values of x,
F= -(mgx + qE)
But this won’t be a Simple harmonic motion. I am stuck here.
To find the DE for SHM, find the torque about the point of suspension due to mg (torque due to tension will be zero as its line of action passes through the point of suspension) and equate that to I\alpha where \alpha=\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}. Here you can use the assumption sinx=x (for small values) and you'll get your DE.
Amith2006 said:
As per them, the direction of effective g’ is inclined to the vertical by angle x. But effective g’ should be vertical, isn’t it?

Here effective g really means the net acceleration acting on the bob. Dont think its the acceleration in the downward direction.
Amith2006 said:
Does tension contribute to the restoring force experienced by the bob?I think it is the component of weight that contributes to the restoring force? But they haven’t used that concept at all to find the time period. Please help!
Yes, tension does contribute to the restoring force. Infact, tension here is the restoring force. That is why the expression for g(eff) is T/m.
F(restoring)=ma
T=F(restoring)=mg(eff)
Therefore, g(eff)=F(restoring)/m=T/m
 
chaoseverlasting said:
To find the DE for SHM, find the torque about the point of suspension due to mg (torque due to tension will be zero as its line of action passes through the point of suspension) and equate that to I\alpha where \alpha=\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}. Here you can use the assumption sinx=x (for small values) and you'll get your DE.

Yes, tension does contribute to the restoring force. Infact, tension here is the restoring force. That is why the expression for g(eff) is T/m.

You said that torque due to tension is zero. In that case will tension contribute to the restoring force?Isn't what you say contradictory?
 
Surely F_E also has a torque contribution and should be included in the derivation of the DE!

To elaborate further on my previous point - the effective weight of an object can be defined as the force it exerts on a spring scale in a particular reference system. Therefore the effective gravitational acceleration follows from

g\prime = \frac{T}{m}

where T is the reading on the spring scale. The direction of the effective gravitational acceleration of the object is then in the opposite direction of the tension vector.
 
That's cool!Thanks.
 
Yeah, sorry. F_e must also be included in the expression for torque.
 
Torque of the tension about the point of suspension is zero, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't contribute to the restoring force.

Torque can be zero, but the force necessarily isnt. Similarly, the net force can be zero, but the torque doesn't have to be (electric dipole in a uniform electric field).

The torque is zero, because the line of action of the force passes through that point. Since torque is defined as (force)x(perpendicular distance), the perpendicular distance is zero, hence the torque is zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K