Simple proof of Complex Inner Product Space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the inner product equals 0 for all vectors |v> in a complex inner product space. The proof is divided into two cases: first, when |v> is the zero vector, which is straightforward due to the inner product axiom <0|0> = 0; second, when |v> is non-zero, where the summation = Σv_i * 0_i clearly results in 0. The participant confirms the correctness of the proof and clarifies that the result pertains to the scalar 0, not the vector 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex inner product spaces
  • Familiarity with inner product axioms
  • Knowledge of vector notation and operations
  • Basic principles of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inner products in complex vector spaces
  • Explore the axioms of inner product spaces in detail
  • Learn about the implications of the zero vector in linear algebra
  • Investigate the concept of linear combinations and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone studying complex vector spaces or inner product theory.

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


Prove that <v|0>=0 for all |v> ∈ V.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



This is a general inner product space.

I break it up into 2 cases.
Case 1: If |v> = 0, the proof is trivial due to inner space axiom stating <0|0> = 0.

Case 2: If |v> =/= 0 then:
I use <v|0> = Σv_i * 0_i
and from here it is clear to see that the sum adds up to 0 as every component is multiplied by the 0 vector.

My question: Is this a safe definition of the complex inner product? Am I OK to use the summation definition in this general proof?
Second Question: Is the proof correct? Any reason why the 0 vector would need to be proven further to sum the components to 0?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I have a better idea.

<v|0> = <v|0v> (by multiplication by 0.)
= 0<v|v> by inner product axiom 2
=0
and done!

This is the scalar 0, and not the vector 0 as stated in the question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K