Simple Quantum Mechanics Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to quantum mechanics, specifically involving the solution to Schrödinger's wave equation and the calculation of the probability of finding a particle within a specified range. The original poster presents a wave function and attempts to compute the probability based on that function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to evaluate the integral of the squared wave function over the specified limits to determine the probability. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the wave function's normalization and the interpretation of the book's answer.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in a dialogue about the validity of the original poster's calculations and the reliability of the textbook referenced. There is a mix of affirmation regarding the original poster's answer and skepticism about the textbook's accuracy.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted assumption that the variable x must be positive for the wave function to be correctly normalized. The discussion also highlights potential issues with the textbook used, including claims of incorrect answers and lack of clarity.

Nothing000
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
1. The solution to Schrödinger's wave equation for a particular situation is given by [tex]\psi(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a_{0}}} \cdot e^{\frac{-x}{a_{0}}}[/tex]. Determine the probability of finding the particle between the limits [tex]0 \leq x \leq a_{0}[/tex]




2. Homework Equations
[tex]\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} {(\psi(x)})^2 dx} = 1[/tex]



3. The Attempt at a Solution
[tex]\int_{0}^{a_{0}} {(\sqrt{\frac{2}{a_{0}}} \cdot e^{\frac{-x}{a_{0}}}})^2 dx}[/tex]
After evaluating that integral I am coming up with 0.864665. So wouldn't that mean that there would be an 86% probability of finding the particle in between those limits? Well, the answer in the back of the book is 4*10^(-14)%
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. I note that, to do this problem, we must *assume* that x must be positive; then the wave function is correctly normalized. A well-written problem would have stated this clearly. And the answer in the back of this book (are you *sure* you looked up the correct problem number??) is nonsense.

What book is this? I like to learn which books to avoid ...
 
So you are saying that MY answer is correct?!

The Book is Semi-Conductor Device Physics by Neamen
 
Yes, your answer is correct.

I assume you mean "Semiconductor Physics and Devices". From a customer review at amazon: "Perhaps the worst textbook I have ever had the misfortune to rely upon in an upper division EE class. ... This text lacks clarity, conciseness, logical flow, and is completely unreliable. Specific examples include not just one or two but at least 60 problems with incorrect answers listed in the back of the text." From another review: "I've seen better explanations of quantum physics written in crayon on bathroom walls."

Show this problem and the book's answer to your prof. Suggest reading the amazon customer reviews.
 
Last edited:
Awesome Avodyne. Thanks buddy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K