Simple Quantum Mechanics Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving Schrödinger's wave equation, specifically the wave function \(\psi(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a_{0}}} \cdot e^{\frac{-x}{a_{0}}}\). The integral evaluation from 0 to \(a_{0}\) yields a probability of approximately 86% for finding the particle within those limits. However, the book "Semi-Conductor Device Physics" by Neamen incorrectly lists the answer as \(4 \times 10^{-14}\%\). Participants confirm the user's solution is correct and critique the textbook for its numerous inaccuracies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schrödinger's wave equation
  • Familiarity with probability density functions in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of integral calculus
  • Experience with quantum physics textbooks and their reliability
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about common errors in quantum physics textbooks
  • Explore alternative resources for semiconductor physics
  • Study the implications of probability in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and semiconductor physics, as well as anyone evaluating the reliability of academic textbooks.

Nothing000
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
1. The solution to Schrödinger's wave equation for a particular situation is given by \psi(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a_{0}}} \cdot e^{\frac{-x}{a_{0}}}. Determine the probability of finding the particle between the limits 0 \leq x \leq a_{0}




2. Homework Equations
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} {(\psi(x)})^2 dx} = 1



3. The Attempt at a Solution
\int_{0}^{a_{0}} {(\sqrt{\frac{2}{a_{0}}} \cdot e^{\frac{-x}{a_{0}}}})^2 dx}
After evaluating that integral I am coming up with 0.864665. So wouldn't that mean that there would be an 86% probability of finding the particle in between those limits? Well, the answer in the back of the book is 4*10^(-14)%
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. I note that, to do this problem, we must *assume* that x must be positive; then the wave function is correctly normalized. A well-written problem would have stated this clearly. And the answer in the back of this book (are you *sure* you looked up the correct problem number??) is nonsense.

What book is this? I like to learn which books to avoid ...
 
So you are saying that MY answer is correct?!

The Book is Semi-Conductor Device Physics by Neamen
 
Yes, your answer is correct.

I assume you mean "Semiconductor Physics and Devices". From a customer review at amazon: "Perhaps the worst textbook I have ever had the misfortune to rely upon in an upper division EE class. ... This text lacks clarity, conciseness, logical flow, and is completely unreliable. Specific examples include not just one or two but at least 60 problems with incorrect answers listed in the back of the text." From another review: "I've seen better explanations of quantum physics written in crayon on bathroom walls."

Show this problem and the book's answer to your prof. Suggest reading the amazon customer reviews.
 
Last edited:
Awesome Avodyne. Thanks buddy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
802
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K