Simple rotational mechanics problem

Click For Summary
Cliff and Will are balancing a 2.0 m board weighing 71 kg, with Cliff positioned 0.6 m from one end and supporting a lunch with a tension of 200 N. The calculations for the forces they exert reveal that Cliff's force is approximately 793 N, while Will's force is around 317 N when calculated from Will's pivot point. However, using Cliff's pivot point leads to a different result for Will's force, approximately 289 N, indicating a calculation error. The discussion emphasizes the importance of torque direction and consistency in calculations, suggesting that all torques should be summed to zero for clarity. Ultimately, the calculations can be reconciled by properly accounting for the torques and their signs.
crybllrd
Messages
120
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Cliff and Will are carrying a uniform 2.0 m board of mass 71 kg. Will is supporting the board at the end while Cliff is 0.6 m from the other end as shown. Cliff has attached his lunch to the end of the board, and the tension in the string supporting the lunch is 200 N.

24g7no0.jpg


A) Find the force that Cliff exerts on the board.

B) Find the force that Will exerts on the board.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



It seems easy enough, I will set Will's Normal force to be the pivot point and solve for Cliff's.

(1.4m)N_{Cliff} = (200N)(2m) + (710N)(1m)

N_{Cliff}\approx 793N


To find Will's, I will subtract the Cliff's (793N) from the total (1110N) to get 317N.

I then wanted to check my answer by solving for Will's by using Cliff as the pivot point, but came up with different numbers.

N_{Will}(1.4m)=(200N)(.6m) + (710N)(.4m)


N_{Will}\approx 289N

Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you get that the total down force is 1110 N? All I see directed down is 200 N + 710 N.

Also, the right side of the second calculation should have torques with a relative minus sign because the weight of the board and the weight of the lunch are on either side of the pivot (Cliff).
 
Last edited:
kuruman said:
All I see directed down is 200 N + 710 N.
So my calculation for Cliff's force (part A) looks correct? I just need to subtract 910N by 793N to get Will's force?

kuruman said:
Also, the right side of the second calculation should have torques with a relative minus sign because the weight of the board and the weight of the lunch are on either side of the pivot (Cliff).

So the second part should have, say,

(-200)(.6) + (710)(.4) = N(1.4)

N = 117
 
Yes and yes. The two calculations agree now, don't they?

For future reference, it is easier to see what is going on if you put all the torques on the same side and say that their sum equals to zero. You can adopt the convention that "counterclockwise" torques are positive and "clockwise" torques are negative. For example, for the second part, you would write

-(N*1.4 m) + (710 N)*(0.4 m) - (200 N)*(0.6 m) = 0

which is the same equation that you have.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
21K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K