Simple Static 3-Particle Model

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the analysis of a simple static model involving three identical particles, specifically focusing on the forces acting on them under pressure. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing free body diagrams to visualize the forces and their directions, particularly the vertical downward force from particle C and the horizontal forces exerted by particles A and B. Key insights include the geometric configuration of the particles forming an equilateral triangle and the necessity to account for normal forces from the ground. The discussion also highlights the need to correctly apply trigonometric functions in force balance equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium in physics
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams
  • Knowledge of force balance equations
  • Basic geometry related to equilateral triangles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in multi-body systems
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free body diagrams
  • Explore the application of trigonometric functions in force analysis
  • Investigate the effects of pressure on particle interactions in static models
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, engineers, and researchers interested in static mechanics, particularly those analyzing multi-particle systems under pressure conditions.

aasnrsd
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
If we have three particles in the configuration shown in the image, how do I show that pressure should not influence the locked configuration? That it is really based on the angle in particle C. It's a very simplified system: 1D, neglecting drag and friction, equal masses, uniform applied pressure on each surface of particle. I have attempted to solve it, but not sure how correct this is! Any help would be appreciated!
Relevant Equations
Forces
Diagram

1716742365807.png


Integrate pressure for each particle:

1716742618081.png


Add normal force and weight
1716742687690.png


Sum all the forces in the x and y direction to get:
1716742719387.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome, @aasnrsd !

It seems to me that the last equality is not correct regarding units (force/pressure).
Besides, that angle is fixed and determined by the geometry of the system formed by the three identical particles (of cylindrical or spherical shape).

Consider that for any change in pressure to unlock the shown configuration, particles A and B must move away from each other in the direction of the only degree of freedom they have: horizontally.

Also consider that such situation could happen only if any pressure-induced vertical downward force from particle C becomes able to overcome the pressure-induced horizontal forces exerted by particles A and B in opposite directions.

I would recommend drawing a free body diagram, considering the magnitude and directions of those three forces.
Then, drawing a force vectors addition and see what situation or unbalance of forces is keeping the configuration locked regardless changes in pressure.

Hints:
1) A line joining the centers of the three particles form an equilateral triangle.
2) The exterior surface exposed to pressure for particles A and B is only 70% of the exterior surface exposed to pressure for particle C.
 
The way you have drawn the diagram the angles are completely determined by the geometry. Plugging that into your final equation gives a relationship between mg and P.

You have treated the particles as infinitely long cylinders. Is that what you want?

The dimensions would balance if you were to include a variable for the radii.

In your force balance equations, I think you have mixed up ##\cos(\phi)## and ##\sin(\phi)##.

Since you allow no force between A and B, I assume you are looking for the condition in which they are barely staying together. But I also see no reference to the normal forces from the ground. I think for A and B you can only use the horizontal force balance.

You can simplify the analysis by using symmetry.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K