Simple Unit Vector Problem: Finding Parallel and Perpendicular Vectors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding unit vectors parallel and perpendicular to the function f(x) = -3x² + 5 at the point (1,2). The slope at this point is determined to be -3, leading to a parallel vector represented as <1i, -3j>. The perpendicular vector is calculated using the dot product method, resulting in <3,1>. The correct approach emphasizes using the derivative f'(1) to obtain the exact slope rather than relying on approximations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Familiarity with vector notation and operations
  • Knowledge of the dot product and its application in vector mathematics
  • Basic graphing skills to visualize functions and points
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to compute derivatives using the definition of limits
  • Study vector operations, including addition, scalar multiplication, and dot products
  • Explore the concept of unit vectors and their significance in physics and engineering
  • Review graphical interpretations of functions and their slopes at specific points
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on vector analysis and derivatives, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to unit vectors and their applications in mathematics.

hagobarcos
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the unit vector normal to the function f(x) = -3x^2 + 5 and the point (1,2)
and find a unit vector parallel, using f(x) and the point (1,2).

Homework Equations



How do I find the slope here? I attempted to just use the point (0,5), and then the given point (1,2),
resulting in a slope of -3/1 or -3.

And since a vector is sometimes a line between two points, used that to develop a form.
So vector parallel equals <1i, -3j>


The perpendicular would simply be pointing 90 degrees out.
So, after setting the dot product equal to zero, vector perp. equals <3,1>


Is this the right track?

The Attempt at a Solution



Then to find the unit vectors for the parallel bit and the perpendicular bit I divided by their magnitudes, sqrt(10).
Attached is a photo of what I did.
 

Attachments

  • Cal Hw 11.1.jpg
    Cal Hw 11.1.jpg
    31.4 KB · Views: 473
Physics news on Phys.org
(1,2) is a point on the graph. The slope at that point is the derivative of the function at 1. Your way of calculating the slope only yields an approximation of the true slope (i.e. the derivative of f at 1). The approximation is better if you choose the second point closer to (1,2). But you don't want an approximation, you want the exact value. You could choose an arbitrary point (x,f(x)) compute the approximate slope as (f(x)-2)/(x-1) and then let x go to 1, but instead of actually doing that, you should recognize that the result of this limit operation is by definition f'(1). You should calculate f'(1) the way you usually find derivatives.

I think it's easier to find a vector parallel to the graph at (1,2) than to find one that's perpendicular to it. So I would find the parallel one first, and then use it to find the perpendicular one.
 
Last edited:
Ohhhhhh! Right. *face palm* :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K