Simple Unitial Rings .... centre is a field .... ? ....

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Rings
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Matej Bresar's book, "Introduction to Noncommutative Algebra" and am currently focussed on Chapter 1: Finite Dimensional Division Algebras ... ...

I need help with some remarks of Bresar in Example 1.21 on simple unital rings ...

Example 1.21 reads as follows:
?temp_hash=ff70c267b1aa1206a42f97293969b974.png

In the above text from Bresar, we read the following:

" ... ... Indeed, if ##c## is a nonzero central element, then ##cA## must be, as a nonzero idea of ##A##, equal to ##A##. This implies that ##c## is invertible. ... ... "Can someone please show me exactly why it is the case that ##cA## being equal to ##A## implies that ##c## is invertible ...Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Bresar - Example 1.21 on Simple Unital Rings ... ....png
    Bresar - Example 1.21 on Simple Unital Rings ... ....png
    23.7 KB · Views: 779
Physics news on Phys.org
We have ##1 \in A##. Therefore ##0 \neq c = c\cdot 1 \in cA## is a non-trivial ideal of ##A##. Since ##A## is simple, it has to be the entire ring, i.e. ##cA=A##. Now ##1 \in A = cA## means ##1## can be written as ##1=c \cdot a## for some ##a \in A##. We denote this ##a## by ##c^{-1}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
Thanks ... appreciate your help ...

Peter