Simple work and accleration problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter highcontrast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accleration Work
Click For Summary
A rope applies a constant horizontal force of 250N to pull a 60kg crate, causing its velocity to increase from 1m/s to 3m/s over 2 seconds. The acceleration of the crate is calculated to be 1m/s², and the net force acting on it is 60N, derived from the equation F = ma. The frictional force opposing the motion is determined to be 190N, which is the difference between the applied force and the net force. The discussion clarifies that the net force is the total of all external forces acting on the crate, including both the applied and frictional forces. Understanding these concepts helps resolve confusion regarding the relationship between net force and individual forces acting on the system.
highcontrast
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rope exerts a constant horiztonal force of 250N to pull a 60kg crate across the floor. The velocity of the crate is observed to increase from 1m/s to 3m/s in a time of 2 seconds under the influence of this force and the frictional force exerted by the floor on the crate
A) what is the acceleration of the crate?
b) what is the netforce acting on the crate?
c) what is the magnitude of the frictional force acting on the crate?

Homework Equations


As stated in the attempt


The Attempt at a Solution


a) because of the given information i use the difference in velocity by time to produce a result of 1m/s. I am not sure if i should be a = fnet/mass

b) i use the eq force = ma, 60kg * 1m/s = 60N

c) This is where i am having difficulty, i know for the acceleration to be 1m/s, the equation would ultimatey have to be a = fnet/mass = 60n/60kg. subtracting 60n from the 250 yeilds the number, 190, which is the one i need to subtract from the given force to get 60. but i am having a hard time understanding how a 60N force on a crate can produce 130n in friction? Am i way off with my attempts?

Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi highcontrast! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(your a and b are fine, and no you don't need to use the mass to get the acceleration from the velocities … it's just a matter of geometry :wink:)
highcontrast said:
c) This is where i am having difficulty, i know for the acceleration to be 1m/s, the equation would ultimatey have to be a = fnet/mass = 60n/60kg. subtracting 60n from the 250 yeilds the number, 190, which is the one i need to subtract from the given force to get 60. but i am having a hard time understanding how a 60N force on a crate can produce 130n in friction? Am i way off with my attempts?

why are you subtracting 60 twice? :confused:

applied force 250 one way, friction force 190 the other way, so net force = 60, so acceleration = 60/60 = 1 …

what's worrying you about that? :smile:
 
That's a much more simple way of puting it! I think I may just be confused about the concept of 'net force' and not all that confident in my abilities. The answer definitely made sense in my head. The notion of 60N force acting on the box is what perplexed me. I, somehow, assumed that to be the netforce acting only on the box, but what I failed to realize is that its one system, meaning that 60N netforce would have been the result of the frictional force, and the pulling force.. Am I right in this line of thought?
 
Hi highcontrast! :wink:

Yes, the net force (the total force) is all the external forces on the body,

and it's always the F in F = ma.

As you say, the box is "one system" …

so in the end we can always lump all the forces together as "one force" (and similarly "one torque"). :smile:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
17K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K