Simplify the logarithim expression

Click For Summary
The expression e^{a ln b} simplifies to b^a, confirming the identity. The identities ln(ab) = ln(a) + ln(b) and ln(a^b) = b ln(a) can be proven using properties of exponents and logarithms. For the derivative d/dx ln(x) = 1/x, a proof can be approached through the definition of the derivative or using the chain rule. The approximation ln(1+x) ~ x for small x is also a useful assumption in calculus. Understanding these logarithmic properties is essential for further mathematical applications.
vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
not actually homework, but things I need to know:

1: simplify the expression e^{a ln b} (write it in a way that dosen't involve logarithims)

i want to prove the identities:
lnab = lna + lnb
lna^b = blna
\frac{d}{dx}lnx = \frac{1}{x}

i also want to derive the useful assumption
ln(1+x) ~ aprrox = x

thank you in advance

---------------------------------------------
my working
1: e^{a ln b} = e^a * e^{ln b} = e^a * b
that's as far as i got, i think that's correct but I'm not sure, because i used a way that INVOLVES logarithims

2:proving lnab = lna + lnb
not quite sure how to prove this..

3:proving lna^b = blna
again not sure how to prove this, I've just remembered the rule and assumed it was right

4:proving d/dx lnx = 1/x
should i be using the taylor series to prove these?
i haven't officially been taught the taylor series yet, but i understand how it works
 
Physics news on Phys.org


vorcil said:
my working
1: e^{a ln b} = e^a * e^{ln b} = e^a * b
that's as far as i got, i think that's correct but I'm not sure, because i used a way that INVOLVES logarithims
That's not correct. You're thinking of the rule ea+b=eaeb, but you're not adding a and ln b.
 


is it not,

b^a then?

i know that is one of the rules, e^{a ln b} = b^a
i can't prove that it's correct but i remember that,
so the first one is just b^a?
 


vorcil said:
is it not,

b^a then?

i know that is one of the rules, e^{a ln b} = b^a
i can't prove that it's correct but i remember that,
so the first one is just b^a?

Yes, because you already know that x^{yz} can also be expressed as (x^y)^z so you simply apply that to your problem and simplify the logarithm. The solutions to problems 2 and 3 can also be derived from these laws of exponents.
 


ianprime0509 said:
Yes, because you already know that x^{yz} can also be expressed as (x^y)^z so you simply apply that to your problem and simplify the logarithm. The solutions to problems 2 and 3 can also be derived from these laws of exponents.


can someone show me the proof for 3 please?
only just managed to figure out a way for problem 2

x=ln(a)
y=ln(b)

a=e^x
b=e^y

a*b = e^x *e^y
a*b = e^(x+y)
ln(a*b) = ln(e^x + e^y)
ln(a*b) = x + y
ln(a*b) = ln(a) + ln(y)
 


For #3, let y = ln a.

y = ln a <==> a = ey
Then ab = (ey)b = eby

Now, rewrite this exponential equation as a log equation, and the result you're looking for will fall out.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K