Simplifying Complex Circuits for Resistance Calculations

  • Thread starter Thread starter xxkbxx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying a complex circuit to calculate current and voltage at specific points. The subject area is electrical circuits, focusing on resistance calculations involving series and parallel configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods for combining resistors R5 and R6, questioning whether they can be treated as a parallel combination. There are attempts to clarify how to incorporate R4 into the overall resistance calculation.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights on combining resistors and expressed varying levels of confidence in their approaches. There is an ongoing exploration of how to represent the circuit effectively, with some guidance provided on notation and reduction techniques.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the circuit and the potential for confusion, particularly with the introduction of additional components like batteries. There is an emphasis on careful notation and step-by-step reduction to avoid errors.

xxkbxx
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Okay - the picture is attached, but what I need to find is the current and voltage throughout certain points on the circuit. What I need help on is figuring out how to simplify this circuit in order to find resistance.


Homework Equations


Parallel Req = (1/R1 + 1/R2)^-1
Series Req = R1 + R2


The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to combine equations for series and parallel circuits - but what can I do with R4? I need to simplify the circuit, but I know I can't put it in parallel with R5 or R6 since it has resistance in both loops. Is there a way to combine R5 and R6. Let me know please...
 

Attachments

  • Image1499.gif
    Image1499.gif
    1.6 KB · Views: 523
Physics news on Phys.org
I think R5 and R6 can be combined since you have only the one voltage source, then added to R4.
 
I tried that before, but I was unsure. The eq of R5 and R6 is (1/(R5) + 1/(R6))^-1 Then that would be added to R4, since R4 is in series. Okay, that makes more sense now - I think I have the rest from here!
 
I believe that tou can join the R5/R6 in parallel more the R4 in series to form a "block" with the R4 in parallel with this block
 
I believe that the circuit would be the same as the attachment from R1, R2, and R3 - but the last branch would have R5 and R6 in parallel in the "block" as you called it, in series with R4.

Would my total resistance than be:
Req = R1 + R2 + (1/(R3) + (1/R4) + (1/(1/R5 + R6))

Specifically, how would I add up the resistance of the R5 and R6 Block?
 
xxkbxx said:
I tried that before, but I was unsure. The eq of R5 and R6 is (1/(R5) + 1/(R6))^-1 Then that would be added to R4, since R4 is in series. Okay, that makes more sense now - I think I have the rest from here!

Right on.

But just wait til they start adding batteries all over.
 
xxkbxx said:
I believe that the circuit would be the same as the attachment from R1, R2, and R3 - but the last branch would have R5 and R6 in parallel in the "block" as you called it, in series with R4.

Would my total resistance than be:
Req = R1 + R2 + (1/(R3) + (1/R4) + (1/(1/R5 + R6))

Specifically, how would I add up the resistance of the R5 and R6 Block?

I think that's close call R4+1/(1/R5+1/R6)=Z
Req=R1 + R2 + 1/(1/r3+1/z) is what I see.
 
xxkbxx said:
I believe that the circuit would be the same as the attachment from R1, R2, and R3 - but the last branch would have R5 and R6 in parallel in the "block" as you called it, in series with R4.

Would my total resistance than be:
Req = R1 + R2 + (1/(R3) + (1/R4) + (1/(1/R5 + R6))

Specifically, how would I add up the resistance of the R5 and R6 Block?

R1+{1/R3+[(1/R5+1/R6)+R4]}+R2
R1+ \{ \frac{1}{R3} + (( \frac{1}{R5}+ \frac{1}{R6} )+ R4) \} + R2
 
Last edited:
xxkbxx said:

Homework Statement


Okay - the picture is attached, but what I need to find is the current and voltage throughout certain points on the circuit. What I need help on is figuring out how to simplify this circuit in order to find resistance.


Homework Equations


Parallel Req = (1/R1 + 1/R2)^-1
Series Req = R1 + R2


The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to combine equations for series and parallel circuits - but what can I do with R4? I need to simplify the circuit, but I know I can't put it in parallel with R5 or R6 since it has resistance in both loops. Is there a way to combine R5 and R6. Let me know please...

Teach you a little trick to make these problems easier.

When two resistors R and r are in parallel, use the notation (R || r) to express the effective resistance. The two parallel lines '||' have an obvious meaning.

When two resistors R and r are in series, just add them up as usual, i.e. the effective resistance is R + r.

Now, your objective is to reduce the diagram in stages to a single resistance. Just forget about the mathematics and express everything in this notation at first.

When you reduce a pair of resistors, immediately redraw the diagram with the effective resistance of the pair as a single resistor. Just stick with the notation.

So, you'd begin : R5 is in parallel with R6, the effective resistance is (R5 || R6). That is now in series with R4, the effective resistance is now (R5 || R6) + R4, and so forth.

When you finally finish the reduction, you should get the effective resistance of the entire circuit (R) as :

R = {[(R5 || R6) + R4] || R3} + R2 + R1

(Be sure to bracket each pair of resistances as you reduce them, to avoid making a mistake).

Looks complicated, but it isn't really when you work through it yourself. It becomes a lot easier if you keep drawing the intermediate steps in the reduction with single resistances replacing the pairs you've reduced.

Now just apply the relation R || r = (1/R + 1/r)^(-1) = (Rr)/(R+r), while taking care with the brackets, and you've got the effective resistance of the circuit.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Slick, I like that. Improves legibility, reduces chance for error, avoids the need to make subs as I did...
 
  • #11
denverdoc said:
Slick, I like that. Improves legibility, reduces chance for error, avoids the need to make subs as I did...

Wait till you see how legible they make (otherwise) complicated complex impedance problems! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
852
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K