Simplifying entropy for a harmonic oscillator in the limit of large N

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying the entropy of a classical harmonic oscillator in the limit of large N. The original poster presents an equation for entropy and seeks to demonstrate its behavior as N approaches infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of large N on the entropy equation, discussing the behavior of terms in the equation and the significance of the fugacity z.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing insights and attempting to manipulate the equations. Some have suggested discarding certain terms in the limit of large N, while others are questioning the assumptions regarding the variables held constant during the analysis.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the limit of large N and its effects on the entropy expression, with discussions on the treatment of terms not multiplied by N. The participants are also considering the implications of holding certain variables constant while varying temperature.

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hey guys,

So I have this equation for the entropy of a classical harmonic oscillator:

\frac{S}{k}=N[\frac{Tf'(T)}{f(T)}-\log z]-\log (1-zf(T))

where z=e^{\frac{\mu}{kT}} is the fugacity, and f(T)=\frac{kT}{\hbar \omega}.

I have to show that, "in the limit of large N, this entropy becomes the following":

\frac{S}{k}=N[1+\log(\frac{kT}{\hbar \omega})]=N[1+\log f(T)]


Homework Equations



None that I know of


The Attempt at a Solution



So all I've done is plugged in the expression for f(T) and f'(T) into the entropy, to get this:

\frac{S}{k}=N(1-\log z)-\log (1-z\frac{kT}{\hbar \omega})

But i don't know what to do when N becomes large...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi again...
So first, observe that from the summation form of Z (in your previous post):
N = z\frac{\partial}{\partial z}logZ
Use that with the explicit form of Z you found there, take the limit N>>1 and see what happens...
Also, in this limit what should you do with the terms that are not multiplied by N?
 
Hey!

Yea you get N=\frac{zf(T)}{1-zf(T)}. If this is to become much greater than 1, then zf(T) \rightarrow 1. And anything that's not multiplied with N can take a hike! but i tried this, i don't get very far...but just to confirm, we only vary T, right? since we held \mu , V constant when we found the entropy...?
 
Last edited:
You have all you need to express the solution. You found that:
S/k = N(1 – logz) – log(1 –zf)
But then in the limit N >>1, you also found that the second term can be discarded and for the first:
zf = 1 (or in other terms z = 1/f)
Just put it together!
 
Okay let me be a bit more specific with what I did.

Start with

\frac{S}{k}= N[\frac{Tf'(T)}{f(T)}-\log z]-\log (1-zf(T))

Using f(T) = kT/hbar ω, we get

\frac{S}{k}=N[1-\log z]-\log (1-z\frac{kT}{\hbar \omega})

Clearly \log z = \frac{\mu}{kT}, but the problem is the expression -\log (1-zf(T))...I tried to manipulate it as follows:

-\log (1-zf(T))=\log (1-zf(T))^{-1}, then using a first order taylor expansion:

(1-zf(T))^{-1} \approx 1+zf(T)

Then the only way you can get a log(zf(T)) term is if you ignore the 1...so finally i get this

N[1-\log z]+\log(1+zf(T))...but I am stuck!
 
okay i'll try that...sorry i guess i was typing while you were typing!
 
Yep i got it...thanks a bunch again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K