Simplifying Equations with Polynomial denominators/numerators

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying equations with polynomial denominators and numerators, specifically involving expressions with terms like x^n and their factorizations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various attempts to factor expressions, including substituting variables to simplify the equations. Questions arise about the validity of these substitutions and the implications for the original problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on substitutions and factorizations, while others express uncertainty about the correctness of their approaches. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, and there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

There are concerns about potential point deductions for using substitutions, and participants are considering how to approach the problem without them. The original equations are complex, and the clarity of the problem setup is questioned.

darshanpatel
Messages
139
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I uploaded a picture of the question because I didn't want to confuse people from the way it looks because it is pretty long.

http://tinypic.com/r/2itpm39/5

Homework Equations



-None-

The Attempt at a Solution



I went from the original equation and took an 'x' out of the first numerator and then got the reciprocal of the x^n and multiplied that through

1. Original Equation
2. (((x^n)-8)/((x^2n)+(2x^n)+1)) x ((x^2n)-(4x^n)-5)/(x^n)

I don't know what I can factor out from this point..
Please help and thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
darshanpatel said:

Homework Statement



I uploaded a picture of the question because I didn't want to confuse people from the way it looks because it is pretty long.

http://tinypic.com/r/2itpm39/5

Homework Equations



-None-

The Attempt at a Solution



I went from the original equation and took an 'x' out of the first numerator and then got the reciprocal of the x^n and multiplied that through

1. Original Equation
2. (((x^n)-8)/((x^2n)+(2x^n)+1)) x ((x^2n)-(4x^n)-5)/(x^n)

I don't know what I can factor out from this point..
Please help and thanks
x2n = (xn)2

That in itself may help you. If not, then let u = xn and substitute that.
 

Attachments

  • 2itpm39.jpg
    2itpm39.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 419
Do you mean x^2n= (x^2)^n

Also as an example, if I took x^n-8 and did that, would it be:

((x)^3n)-(2)^3
and i don't know where to go from there

and for this one:

(x^2n)-(4x^n)-5
((x^2)^n)-((4x)^n)-5
what would i do next?
 
darshanpatel said:
Do you mean x^2n= (x^2)^n
While that's true, SammyS was right to say
x2n = (xn)2

So if you were to make the substitution u = xn,
xn - 8 would become u - 8.
darshanpatel said:
and for this one:

(x^2n)-(4x^n)-5
((x^2)^n)-((4x)^n)-5
what would i do next?
With the substitution, it would be
x2n - 4xn - 5
= (xn)2 - 4xn - 5
= u2 - 4u - 5

Now do the same kind of substitution in the first denominator. Doesn't that expression look familiar now? And can't you do something with u2 - 4u - 5?
 
I substituted all the x^n with y's and ended up with:

(((x^n)-5)((x^n)-2)((x^2n)+(2x^n)+4))/(x^n)((x^n)+1)

Is that all it can get factored and simplified?
 
Also, I think i will lose points by substituting, what is the way without it?
 
darshanpatel said:
I substituted all the x^n with y's and ended up with:

(((x^n)-5)((x^n)-2)((x^2n)+(2x^n)+4))/(x^n)((x^n)+1)

Is that all it can get factored and simplified?

((xn ) - 2) ((x2n ) + (2xn ) + 4) = x3n - 8 ≠ xn - 8
 
I redid it and got: (((x^n)-8)((x^n)-5))/(x^n)((x^n)+1)

Is that correct?

Sorry, I didn't get what you are trying to say
 
darshanpatel said:
I redid it and got: (((x^n)-8)((x^n)-5))/(x^n)((x^n)+1)

Is that correct?
If you mean
[tex]\frac{(x^n-8)(x^n-5)}{x^n(x^n+1)}[/tex]
... then yes, looks right.
 
  • #10
darshanpatel said:
Also, I think i will lose points by substituting, what is the way without it?

Substituting isn't necessary, but makes things look simpler.

For example, if you were asked to factorize

[tex]x^2+4ax+4a^2[/tex]

then it isn't very clear what needs to be done, but if you let 2a=b then you have

[tex]x^2+2bx+b^2[/tex] and this is clearly a perfect square, so you can factorize it as so:

[tex](x+b)^2[/tex] and then you can substitute back in at the end to obtain

[tex](x+2a)^2[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K