MHB Simplifying exponential expressions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the expression 8p^-3 x (4p^2)^-2/p^-5. The initial approach involved flipping the negative exponents, leading to an incorrect simplification. It was clarified that the 8 should remain in the numerator since it does not have a negative exponent, which affects the final result. After correcting the steps, the numerical part simplifies to 1/2, leading to the correct answer of 1/2p^2. The importance of accurately handling exponents in simplification is emphasized.
arl2267
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Simplify 8p-3 x (4p2)-2/p-5.

This is what I got:

First thing I did was flip everything to get rid of the negative exponents:

p5/8p3x(4p2)2

next thing I did was multiply the 4p2 by 2

p5/ 8p3x16p4Then I subtracted thep5 from the 8p3

p2/8x16p4

and ended up with

1/128p2 I know that the answer is 1/2p2​ so where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
After expanding the brackets

$\displaystyle \frac{8p^{-3}\times 4^{-2}\times p^{-4}}{p^{-5}}$

$\displaystyle \frac{8p^{-3}\times p^{-4}}{4^{2}\times p^{-5}}$

You can now see the numerical part is $\displaystyle\frac{8}{16}= \frac{1}{2}$
 
In your first step where you "flip" everything, you cannot do this with the 8 since it does not have a negative exponent. If you had left the 8 in the numerator, then you would have gotten the desired result.

edit: Welcome to the forum, and I certainly appreciate the fact that you show your work...this makes it much easier to address where your error(s) may be.:cool:
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top