MHB Simplifying exponential expressions

arl2267
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Simplify 8p-3 x (4p2)-2/p-5.

This is what I got:

First thing I did was flip everything to get rid of the negative exponents:

p5/8p3x(4p2)2

next thing I did was multiply the 4p2 by 2

p5/ 8p3x16p4Then I subtracted thep5 from the 8p3

p2/8x16p4

and ended up with

1/128p2 I know that the answer is 1/2p2​ so where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
After expanding the brackets

$\displaystyle \frac{8p^{-3}\times 4^{-2}\times p^{-4}}{p^{-5}}$

$\displaystyle \frac{8p^{-3}\times p^{-4}}{4^{2}\times p^{-5}}$

You can now see the numerical part is $\displaystyle\frac{8}{16}= \frac{1}{2}$
 
In your first step where you "flip" everything, you cannot do this with the 8 since it does not have a negative exponent. If you had left the 8 in the numerator, then you would have gotten the desired result.

edit: Welcome to the forum, and I certainly appreciate the fact that you show your work...this makes it much easier to address where your error(s) may be.:cool:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top