Simplifying to a Geometric Series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation using power series, specifically focusing on simplifying the resulting series into a geometric series. The original poster has derived a recurrence relation and is attempting to identify a pattern in the coefficients of the series generated.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the relationship between coefficients and questioning the pattern of the series. There is an emphasis on systematically deriving the coefficients rather than guessing. Some participants suggest writing terms in relation to earlier coefficients to identify a pattern.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the series coefficients, with some participants providing insights into factorial expressions and their relationships. While there are corrections to earlier terms, no consensus has been reached on a definitive pattern or simplification method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in the series terms and question the completeness of the derived expressions. There is a focus on ensuring that all terms are accounted for in the series representation.

xago
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a question with asks to solve a differential equation via power series and I've done everything up to finding the recurrence relation which is a_{n+2} = -\frac{a_{n}}{n+2}
Given the initial conditions a_{o} = 1 and a_{1} = 0 I'm trying to simplify the series into a geometric series. The series is 1,-1/2, 1/8, -1/48, 1/480, -1/5760 etc...

The Attempt at a Solution



So far I've gotten (-1)^{n} in the numerator to account for the alternating negative sign, however I can't find the denominator for the life of me...
my best attempt is \frac{(-1)^{n}}{(2^n)} but it only works for the first 2 terms :S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't just try to randomly guess what the pattern is by looking at the first few terms. You want to try to do it a little more systematically than that. Try to write a_{n+2} in terms of a_0 (hopefully you noticed that all the odd coefficients are zero).

i.e., start writing
a_{2k+2} = -\frac{a_{2k}}{2k+2} = (-1)^2\frac{a_{2k-2}}{(2k+2)(2k)} = (-1)^3\frac{a_{2k-4}}{(2k+2)(2k)(2k-2)} = \dots
and then see if you can guess a pattern that gives a_{2k+2} = a_0/(\mbox{stuff}). (note that I set n = 2k).

Once you figure out the pattern, if you want to legitimately prove it's correct you can prove it using induction (i.e., prove it holds for k = 1, then prove that if you assume the form is true for k it follows that it's true for k+1).

Also, note that the terms in a geometric series have the form ar^k. Your terms won't look quite like this, so it's not exactly a geometric series.
 
The best I can do is 2k! which gives 2k(2k-2)(2k-4)...right? it works up k=3 to but it's missing the 2k+2 term and doesn't work for k=4
I know 2k! is expressed as 2^{k}k! but how is (2k+2)! expressed in such a way that I can calculate it?

edit*
oops, 2k! is right I believe. I miscalculated the series in my first post, instead of -1/48, 1/480 it should have been -1/48, 1/384 etc..
 
Last edited:
Looks like 1/480 should be 1/384 instead, and 1/5760 be 1/3840. Did you skip a term?

In any case, you might want to check out Sloan's Sequences: https://oeis.org/
 
xago said:
The best I can do is 2k! which gives 2k(2k-2)(2k-4)...right? it works up k=3 to but it's missing the 2k+2 term and doesn't work for k=4
I know 2k! is expressed as 2^{k}k! but how is (2k+2)! expressed in such a way that I can calculate it?

If you're still not sure, just take (2k)! and replace k with k + 1: (2(k+1))! = (2k+2)! = 2k+1(k+1)!, such that

a_{2k+2} = \frac{(-1)^{k+1}}{2^{k+1}(k+1)!}
 
xago said:
The best I can do is 2k! which gives 2k(2k-2)(2k-4)...right? it works up k=3 to but it's missing the 2k+2 term and doesn't work for k=4
I know 2k! is expressed as 2^{k}k! but how is (2k+2)! expressed in such a way that I can calculate it?
(2k+2)!= (2(k+1))! so it would just be 2^{k+1}(k+1)!

edit*
oops, 2k! is right I believe. I miscalculated the series in my first post, instead of -1/48, 1/480 it should have been -1/48, 1/384 etc..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K