Integrating \int_0^2 \sqrt{65e^{2t}} dt for Beginners

  • Thread starter Thread starter 7yler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral \(\int_0^2 \sqrt{65 e^{2t}} dt\) requires simplification before integration. The expression can be rewritten as \(\int_0^2 \sqrt{65} e^t dt\) by recognizing that \(\sqrt{65 e^{2t}} = \sqrt{65} e^t\). This allows for straightforward integration using the formula for the integral of an exponential function. The correct evaluation of this integral leads to the result \(\sqrt{65} (e^2 - 1)\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic integration techniques
  • Familiarity with exponential functions
  • Knowledge of LaTeX for mathematical notation
  • Ability to manipulate square roots and exponents
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice integrating exponential functions using the formula \(\int e^{kt} dt = \frac{1}{k} e^{kt} + C\)
  • Learn about the properties of square roots and their application in integration
  • Explore LaTeX for formatting mathematical expressions in documents
  • Study definite integrals and their applications in real-world problems
USEFUL FOR

Students learning calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to improve their integration skills, particularly with exponential functions.

7yler
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I am familiar with integration, but I'm stumped with this. How do you integrate something such as \int(from 0 to 2)\sqrt{65e(to the power of 2t}dt

That is supposed to be the square root of 65e to the power of 2t.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


you should simplify the argument first.
 


Here's how you'd write your integral using LaTeX:
Code:
\int_0^2 \sqrt{65 e^{2t}} dt
which, when enclosed by "TEX" and "/TEX" (with the quotation marks replaced by square brackets), gives
\int_0^2 \sqrt{65 e^{2t}} dt​

Anyway, try using the fact that \sqrt{a}=a^{1/2}.
 


Well, another to put it would be to see that

e^{2t} = (e^t)^2

which would fit nicely with the square root.
 


So I would get 65e^2 - 65?
 


Well, the 65 is still under a radical. Only e^t is squared under the square root.
 
Last edited:


So 65(e^2) - 65 is what I get when I follow through with the calculations, but I'm told that that answer is incorrect.
 


You didn't understand. The 65 must be under the radical sign, as in \sqrt{65}.
 


Oh okay. Thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K