Skier going down a hill force and motion question

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 11K views
zeion
Messages
455
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A sight seen on many "bunny" hills across Ontario is young skiers pushing on ski poles and gliding down a slope until they come to rest/ Observing from a distance, you note a young person (approximately 25 kg) pushing off with the ski poles to give herself an initial velocity of 3.5m/s^2. If the inclination of the hill is 5.0 degrees and the coefficient of kinetic friction for the skis on dry snow is 0.20, calculate

a) the time taken for the skier to come to a stop
b) the distance traveled down the hill


Homework Equations




V final ^2 = V initial ^ 2 + 2 a t


The Attempt at a Solution



a)

Given:
m = 25kg
V initial = 3.5 m/s^2
Angle of hill = 5 degrees
coefficient kinetic = 0.20

I need to find acceleration to use that formula to find time, acceleration down the hill with no initial velocity and just gravity is Fg parallel to the hill - Fk kinetic friction acting in the opposite direction.

Given:
m = 25kg
V initial = 3.5 m/s^2
Angle of hill = 5 degrees
coefficient kinetic = 0.20

Fg parallel to hill = mg sin 5
Fk parallel to hill = mg cos 5 0.20

Fg = (25kg)(9.8m/s^2)(sin5) = 21.35kgm / s^2 < Why are my units weird here?
Fk = (25kg)(9.8m/s^2)(cos5)(0.20) = 48.81kgm / s^2

21.35 - 48.81 = -27.46

The kinetic friction is greater than gravity parallel to hill, does that mean the skier can't move down with just gravity alone?

Or maybe the value I found for "Fk" is not kinetic friction because I think it might just be the Fn acting perpendicular to the hill. So then how do I find Fk?

Fk = Fn 0.20 ?

But I've already applied the friction coefficient to find Fn.

So then what is -27.46? Is it the acceleration parallel to hill due to gravity?



Assuming I have found the correct value for acceleration,
V final ^2 = V initial ^2 + 2at
V final is 0
V initial is 3.5m/s

t = -V initial ^ 2 / 2 a
t = (-3.5m/s)^2 / 2(-27.46m/s^2)
t = 0.22s


b)

Assuming I have found the correct value for t

d = v average t
Do I use this formula to find d?
If V final = 0 is V average = 3.5m/s + 0 / 2 = 1.75m/s?
So,
d = (1.75m/s)(0.22s)
d = 0.39m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fg parallel to hill = mg sin 5
Fk parallel to hill = mg cos 5 0.20
makes sense. So
ma = mg sin 5 - mg cos 5 0.20 downhill
a = g(sin5 - cos5)
Negative means it is decelerating.
 
Delphi51 said:
ma = mg sin 5 - mg cos 5 0.20 downhill
a = g(sin5 - cos5)

I don't really understand how you arrived at this. You mean that total force going down parallel to hill = Fg - Fk, this is Fa, and Fa = ma, so ma = mg sin 5 - mg cos 5 0.20.
And then you factored out the mg so it becomes mg (sin 5 - cos 5 0.20) = ma, and then you cancel out the m, so should it be a = g(sin 5 - cos 5 0.20) ? How come there is no mu kinetic (0.20) in your equation?

If this is so, then

a = (9.8m/s ^ 2)(-909038955)(0.20) = -1.7m/s ^ 2
Which is not what I get if I don't do the factoring and canceling of m. Does this mean I always have to factor and cancel out terms to get the right answer?


So assuming now I have the correct value for a = -1.7m/s^2, I can find the time with this formula?

t = -V initial ^ 2 / 2 a
t = (-3.5m/s)^2 / 2(-1.7m/s^2)
t = 3.6s

Is this correct?
 
a = g(sin 5 - cos 5 0.20)
Quite right - the .2 slipped away on me - good catch!
The idea is to write that the sum of the forces along the ramp equals ma, then find a.
You don't need to cancel the m's, but it saves calculations.
I'm getting a = -1.10. I don't know if you or I have the error.

t = -V initial ^ 2 / 2 a
There is something the matter with this. The basic formula is Vf = Vi + a*t
so t = (Vf - Vi)/a
 
Delphi51 said:
I'm getting a = -1.10. I don't know if you or I have the error.

Ok, so this is what I'm doing
a = g[(sin 5) - (cos 5)](0.20)
a = (9.8m/s^2)[(0.087155742) - (0.996194698)](0.20)
a = (9.8m/s^2)(-0.909038956)(0.20)
a = (9.8m/s^2)(-0.181807791)
a = -1.781716344 m/s^2

And yes I see I have copied the formula for t wrong, thank you.