SLAC Electrons: Mass, Velocity & EM Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter HarryWertM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
HarryWertM
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
In the Stanford Linear Accelerator electrons are accelerated thereby gaining mass; velocity; and undoubtedly radiating EM energy. I'm sure they have grounded shielding to avoid loud pops on local AM radio.

But suppose they decelerate electrons the same way - thereby radiating EM energy; losing velocity; and losing mass?? How is energy then conserved?? By creating negative or imaginary mass?? Or do electrons gain even more mass during deceleration, creating "heavy electrons"??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electrons are decelerated against an electric or magnetic force. They exert pressure and force against the magnets to do this. Also, when they radiate energy, that energy has mass. Energy and mass are conserved.
 
So after deceleration, the electrons would have their original "rest mass"?
 
HarryWertM said:
So after deceleration, the electrons would have their original "rest mass"?

That is exactly correct. :biggrin:
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top