Sliding Rings on Rods: Solving for Inextensible String Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings Sliding
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving sliding rings on rods connected by an inextensible string. Participants are exploring the relationships between the velocities of the rings and the geometry of the setup, particularly focusing on the implications of the string's inextensibility.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equality of velocity components along the string and question the implications of the string being inextensible. There are attempts to derive relationships between the positions of the rings and the lengths involved, as well as inquiries about the coordinate system and the distances involved.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the correctness of their assumptions and calculations. There is a recognition of the complexity of the relationships involved, with some participants suggesting alternative approaches and clarifying misunderstandings. No consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of the string's length and the distances between the poles, as well as the behavior of the rings as they move. There are indications of confusion regarding the geometric relationships and the effects of the inextensibility of the string on the velocities of the rings.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


(see attachment)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure about this but as the string is inextensible, the component of velocity of the rings along the string should be equal. O' moves downwards and O moves upwards (not sure but it looks so). Hence, ##v_1\cos \alpha=v_2\cos \alpha \Rightarrow v_1=v_2 ## but this is apparently wrong.
 

Attachments

  • rings1.png
    rings1.png
    37 KB · Views: 505
  • rings2.png
    rings2.png
    8.6 KB · Views: 509
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a couple of equations that relate the positions of the rings with the length of the string and the distance between the poles. Write them down, use them to find the velocity of O.
 
voko said:
There are a couple of equations that relate the positions of the rings with the length of the string and the distance between the poles. Write them down, use them to find the velocity of O.

Position from where? Should I fix the co-ordinate system with origin at A?
 
Suppose the string has length s and the rods are distance h apart. When O'A' = x, what is the distance OA?
 
haruspex said:
Suppose the string has length s and the rods are distance h apart. When O'A' = x, what is the distance OA?

##OA=x+\sqrt{s^2-h^2}##?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
##OA=x+\sqrt{s^2-h^2}##?

How come OA grows infinitely as x increases?
 
voko said:
How come OA grows infinitely as x increases?

See attachment.
##OA=OB+BA \Rightarrow OA=x+\sqrt{s^2-h^2}##

Why is it wrong? :confused:
 

Attachments

  • rings.png
    rings.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 443
How come BA is fixed? Surely as x grows, it should get smaller, because the string is inextensible.
 
It cannot be v1=v2.
Here's why:
Assume the distance between the two poles as 'x' and the string length 's', the distance to be traveled by O' to reach the height of O will be √(s^2-x^2). Now, as s tends to x (i.e the ring O' starts to reach height of the ring O, it will already have a velocity, whereas O will remain to be at rest till O' lowers and starts pulling O.
Therefore, V1>V2
You can try using trigonometric ratios to prove the same.
i.e
Sin(90-alpha) = √(s^2-h^2)/(s^2)
 
  • #10
Pranav-Arora said:
See attachment.
##OA=OB+BA \Rightarrow OA=x+\sqrt{s^2-h^2}##

Why is it wrong? :confused:
Because s is not equal to the hypotenuse, OO'. The string runs from O to A' via O'..
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
Because s is not equal to the hypotenuse, OO'. The string runs from O to A' via O'..

Yep, I realized it before I went to sleep.

This time I get ##OA=x+\sqrt{(s-x)^2-h^2}##.

Differentiating w.r.t time,
[tex]\frac{d(OA)}{dt}=v_2=\frac{dx}{dt}-\frac{(s-x)}{\sqrt{(s-x)^2+h^2}}\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]
##dx/dt=v_1## and ##s-x=h/\sin \alpha##, using these
[tex]v_2=v_1\left(1-\frac{1}{\cos \alpha}\right)=-v_1\frac{2\sin^2 \alpha/2}{\cos \alpha}[/tex]

Is this correct?

I still don't understand what's wrong with my attempt in the first post.
 
  • #12
Pranav-Arora said:
Yep, I realized it before I went to sleep.

This time I get ##OA=x+\sqrt{(s-x)^2-h^2}##.

Differentiating w.r.t time,
[tex]\frac{d(OA)}{dt}=v_2=\frac{dx}{dt}-\frac{(s-x)}{\sqrt{(s-x)^2+h^2}}\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]
##dx/dt=v_1## and ##s-x=h/\sin \alpha##, using these
[tex]v_2=v_1\left(1-\frac{1}{\cos \alpha}\right)=-v_1\frac{2\sin^2 \alpha/2}{\cos \alpha}[/tex]

Is this correct?
A minus turned into a plus in the middle there, but it must have been a transcription error because it came out right in the end.
I still don't understand what's wrong with my attempt in the first post.
I didn't understand your reasoning there, so I can't say where it was wrong.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
A minus turned into a plus in the middle there, but it must have been a transcription error because it came out right in the end.

I didn't understand your reasoning there, so I can't say where it was wrong.

Thank you haruspex! :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K